This volume examines what happened to Averroes’s philosophy during the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Did early modern thinkers really no longer pay any attention to the Commentator?
This volume examines what happened to Averroes’s philosophy during the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Did early modern thinkers really no longer pay any attention to the Commentator?
This volume brings together, for the first time, essays investigating Averroes’s complex reception, in different philosophical topics and among several Jewish authors, with special attention to its relation to the reception of Maimonides.
" The introduction places the work historically and sketches the controversy to which it was a contribution. Part 2 includes the Latin Leonine text and McInerny's translation.
... Averroism into the burgeoning scholastic tradition, influencing a generation of thinkers who sought to grapple with the intricate relationship between faith and reason. The legacy of Averroism thus extends beyond Averroes himself ...
... Averroism The name given to the position of those , particularly in the thir- teenth century , whose * Aristotelianism carried them much farther than the moderate Aristotelianism of Thomas Aquinas ( see * Thomism ) , and who were ...
... Averroism Several points emerge from the arguments we have briefly presented . Contrary to what E. Gilson said long ago , Averroism is not at all an “ obstinate and stubborn Aristotelianism , " satisfied with repeating Averroes and not ...