Battlefield 2 invades the high-tech frontlines of modern warfare. The game brings the intensity and excitement of Battlefield 1942 into the modern era with enhanced team play and the latest, most technologically advanced vehicles and weapons systems available to man.
Description
It's been a while since my last addons/mods upload, so here it is. BFBC2 map pack for BF2.
Preview
Post a comment
Profile
Icon
Developer
DICEPublisher
Electronic ArtsEngine
Refractor 2Contact
Send MessageHomepage
Battlefield.ea.comRelease date
Game watch
Follow
Related Games
Battlefield 2
First Person Shooter
Related Engines
Refractor 2
Commercial
Related Groups
DICE
Developer & Publisher
Electronic Arts
Developer & Publisher
Tags
Heavy Metal:
Atacama Desert:
Isla Innocentes:
Arica Harbor:
Note: I apologise for the non-direct download file. I thought ModDB also accepts Mediafire links. I wouldn't like to waste my time uploading it again into the ModDB download server. Unfortunately, I've uploaded the file into Mediafire in the first place already. Don't worry, THERE'S NO SCAM, just a normal Mediafire link.
File size: 651 MB
Nice, thank you. Any mayor changes?
Destructible trees, i think?
And also textures and lods optimization.
yea, saw it while shelling in Isla Inocentes, looks cool.
The trees crashing, but also the FPS :)
No need to apologise bro! You did nothing wrong.
Thank you for the maps!
Yoo thanks bro! Enjoy!
Simply incredible work. Never thought to see these BC2 maps recreated to such a degree of wonder as this in good 'ole BF2. /slow clap
Thanks, bro! Also never dreamed of this before. lol.
Dude, you're my hero. THANKS!!
My pleasure, mate. Enjoy!
Does it worked in other mods Mohammed_Furqon 🤔🙄?
Idk. It works fine on Vanilla.
Fantastic as always from the Legend himself. Thank You very much
lmao. thanks!
Wow, these are incredible! I didn't even know it was possible to get maps that feel so close to the originals in BF2. Amazing work!
Wow amazing! Thank you!
Mantap bang ane coba ah pake Clean BF2
very nice)
Has one of the persons who rated here really played the maps??
- the picture from the prieview doesn't really show the maps, these are simply pictures of dice's bc2, all maps don't really look like shown, not even close
- Maps descriptions telling rus vs. us but all maps are china vs us
- The map arica doesn't work, some russian gpo is missing here, map is crashing the game when loading
- most not destructible objects have no lightmaps
- 95% of all objects have wrong texture formats, they flicker enormously and looking very bad when you look at them closely
- a lot of textures of the objects have bad tiling
- most objects and buildings are just stuffed into each other without any sense of accuracy and precision
- several textures have a completely white alpha channel, which makes the objects high-gloss and very shiny
- minimaps do not match the maps, these are copied from bc2
- several objects have stretched textures
- many objects floating over the ground
- almost no road textures were used or roads are painted
- mostly no smoothing on the terrain
- mec vehicles and helicopters are used, although the maps play against china
- fog does not match the skybox on any map
- the terrain lightmaps are very bad
- terrain detail textures mostly do not match the color texture
- undergrowth (grass) dosent fit the maps and the terrain, lots of missplaced undergrwoth in buildings etc.
- windmills on heavy metal are made entirely of concrete?
- not a single control point has details, the buildings and objects were just thrown in with not much attention to detail
- cablepoles have no cables, means - no internet and teleph
- overgrowth (trees) have zero lightning and color optimization, just black at the bottom
These are really bad ports that don't even come close to the original...
I really cant see 10 points here, not even the half of that.
I find it valuable and kind of funny that you have a precise view on details. GJ
But, even though the maps probably much improvable,
it's still 10 worth because of the massive time and effort consumption to make those maps and in the end they are fun to play.
Of course, the author probably spent a lot of time here.
I do absolutely respect that.
But it is still more than unrealistic to give this product the maximum possible number of points, because factually that is simply not true.
This has nothing to do with dissrespect, but it simply does not correspond to the nature of an objective assessment.
Take a look at mods like fh2 or heat of battle, these are quality mods that deserve 10 points.
Of course this is about these maps, but if these maps were the only ones in heat of battle, you would also complain and never award this number of points.
I got your point and the imperfections you listed for all those
maps are probably all true.
But the whole MODDB rating is anyway not precise.
An objective assessment(rating) should be like:
5 average
7 good
8 real good and flawless
10 very rare, super supreme perfect stuff
Mostly people rate 10 to give the appreciation for the work, which is not correct.
Others go nuts if you give 7 because they think it is an offense hahaha.
And addons that got a just simple function get bad ratings, even though they work 100% and flawless.
Anyway
One could argue heat of battle is a 7-8 because you can't play MP
I never played it. I just saw the positive feedback on YouTube.
One of my friends just told me it’s a good looking rip-off of the best contents the bf2 community
Made the past years. But if no network gaming is possible, i agree with you.
Hi, BF2all. This guy is just comparing a "whole team-made" creation with a "single man-made" creation. No problem, bro. You may take the point.
Hi, Mohammend_Furqon.
No, you two didn't completely understand my point.
I really like the maps, just played one of them few minutes ago =)
But they don't deserve 10 points. As already said, this is not meant personally, but to rate 10 points as if things couldn't get any better is simply not factual.
I only compared the ratings with the quality actually delivered.
Arica crashes and dosent work, no update or anything else.
A rating of 10 would mean flawless and perfect, which unfortunately is not the case here.
The fact that you don't respond to any of the bugs I've described tells me that you're not in a position to answer reasonably.
So none of you take the points i guess.
If you've ever port objects from the other game into this "ancient" game (Frostbite engine to Refractor in this case). You'll understand. Things are all completely different. I'm tired to explain all of this, I'd like to remain silent, btw. Bf2 modding masters probably will mostly understand it. All maps are tested in Vanilla BF2, and the Arica Harbor is working. Thanks for your feedback.
I guess the map works for you, because you have the missing files inside the bf2 objects folders somewhere and the map loads them from there.
Here are two screenshots of the missing files, like i said arica dosent work =(
Ibb.co
Ibb.co
Ah, I see. just replace "com_airdrop_ru" or "com_airdrop" with "flagpole" (without quotes), then save. Thanks for your report.
Ok thanks, the map works now.
Unfortunately, my anticipation was quickly suppressed when I realized that there is neither Arica or the port on the map!??
Ibb.co
Luckily you're probably not one of the "Bf2 modding masters" you mentioned above..
But the map is playable, that's what matters, I've adjusted my rating accordingly. ;-)
Yes, I'm not one of those BF2 modding masters.
If you're interested more in BF2 modding, please join our discord community here:
Discord.gg
WoW!
I cant wait to play those in the fall. I am currently on vacation in Canada.
This comment is currently awaiting admin approval, join now to view.