WO1995017685A1 - Vehicle location and collision avoidance system - Google Patents

Vehicle location and collision avoidance system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1995017685A1
WO1995017685A1 PCT/US1994/014922 US9414922W WO9517685A1 WO 1995017685 A1 WO1995017685 A1 WO 1995017685A1 US 9414922 W US9414922 W US 9414922W WO 9517685 A1 WO9517685 A1 WO 9517685A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
target vehicle
vehicle
range
aircraft
data message
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1994/014922
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Jesse H. Tanner
Original Assignee
Tanner Jesse H
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tanner Jesse H filed Critical Tanner Jesse H
Priority to AU15552/95A priority Critical patent/AU1555295A/en
Publication of WO1995017685A1 publication Critical patent/WO1995017685A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/0004Transmission of traffic-related information to or from an aircraft
    • G08G5/0008Transmission of traffic-related information to or from an aircraft with other aircraft
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S19/00Satellite radio beacon positioning systems; Determining position, velocity or attitude using signals transmitted by such systems
    • G01S19/01Satellite radio beacon positioning systems transmitting time-stamped messages, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System], GLONASS [Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System] or GALILEO
    • G01S19/13Receivers
    • G01S19/14Receivers specially adapted for specific applications
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S5/00Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations
    • G01S5/0009Transmission of position information to remote stations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/0017Arrangements for implementing traffic-related aircraft activities, e.g. arrangements for generating, displaying, acquiring or managing traffic information
    • G08G5/0021Arrangements for implementing traffic-related aircraft activities, e.g. arrangements for generating, displaying, acquiring or managing traffic information located in the aircraft
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/0073Surveillance aids
    • G08G5/0078Surveillance aids for monitoring traffic from the aircraft
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/88Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications
    • G01S13/93Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes
    • G01S13/933Radar or analogous systems specially adapted for specific applications for anti-collision purposes of aircraft or spacecraft

Definitions

  • This invention relates to systems and methods for providing and displaying vehicle collision avoidance information.
  • One system has ultra-precise, airborne clocks aboard each aircraft to provide precise synchronizing reference signals, and each aircraft is prompted to simultaneously transmit an identification signal.
  • Distance between aircraft is determined by measurement of the elapsed time between the transmission of an identification signal and receipt of that signal.
  • This system provides only distance information and does not provide relative bearing or position information. It is readily appreciated that maintenance of all of the ultra-precise, airborne clocks is difficult. All of the aircraft within an airspace transmit identification signals at the same time, causing interference and confusion so that the ability of this type of system to resolve one signal from a large number of other signals is limited.
  • Another system uses a cooperative interrogation and reply technique whereby an interrogating aircraft transmits a signal and measures the elapsed time between the transmission of the signal and the receipt of a reply signal from a responding aircraft.
  • the ability of the system to resolve the signals from each of a large number of aircraft occupying the same airspace is also limited.
  • a system whereby each aircraft carries its own expensive scanning radar system obviously presents problems of economics, not to mention the severe clutter and jamming caused by a large number of such systems operating within the same airspace.
  • Another system uses ground-based radar for determining the position of all aircraft within an airspace and transmits positional data to each aircraft by means of ground-based data transmission links. This system requires radar and data processing facilities which are not available in every geographic area.
  • Tanner patent is directed to a collision avoidance system that assigns time slots based on the relative azimuth and range of an aircraft with respect to a local ground-based VOR station. Each aircraft transmits a signal identifying its relative position with respect to the location of the VOR station.
  • the system disclosed in the Tanner patent effectively avoids collisions, but requires other aircraft to convert the relative position signals into global position information such as latitude and longitude.
  • Vehicle position information in latitude and longitude is provided to each receiving vehicle, together with a precise timing signal, by an existing satellite positioning system.
  • a synthetic latitude function (y coordinate axis) and a synthetic longitude function (x coordinate axis) provide a periodic mapping of a specific time period onto areas represented by grid segments charted on the global surface. These synthetic functions are initiated and controlled by the precise timing signal from the satellite position system, and provide correlation between relative position and time slot mapping.
  • Each grid segment is assigned a reference waypoint preferably originating at the northernmost and westernmost point of the grid segment, and extending skyward from that point.
  • the vehicle's relative position in a grid segment with respect to the reference waypoint of that grid segment is determined mathematically.
  • the vehicle's relative position in the grid segment is correlated to the time mapping of the grid segment provided by the synthetic functions.
  • the vehicle transmits a digitally encoded data message during the corresponding mapped time slot of the grid segment. Since this time slot is uniquely assigned to the vehicle, interference caused by simultaneous transmissions from other vehicles is avoided.
  • the relative position within a grid segment is used to assign the transmission time slot, it is not the position data that is transmitted in the data message.
  • Actual position data in latitude and longitude obtained from the satellite positioning system is transmitted in the data message.
  • These -data are used to provide input to position displays and in cases where the vehicles are aircraft, to collision warning devices.
  • a third axis representing altitude is used to create a three dimensional mapping of time slots over the volume of a grid segment.
  • Figure 1 is a pictorial representation of aircraft using a system according to the invention.
  • Figure 2 is a block diagram of a system for receiving and transmitting location and other information according to the invention.
  • Figure 3 shows a vehicle location method applicable to all embodiments of the invention.
  • Figure 4 shows a partial charting of grid segments into the southern hemisphere starting at the equator and at the zero meridian according to the invention.
  • Figure 5 is a rectangular plot representing the area mapped by a synthetic latitude functiona and a synthetic longitude function according to the invention, and illustrating the charting of the global surface into grid segments.
  • Figure 6 is a method of computing the hazard of collision, triggering appropriate warnings, and displaying target aircraft according to the invention.
  • Figure 7 is a rectangular plot illustrating the charting of an airport surface into grid segments according to the invention.
  • Figure 8 is a rectangular plot illustrating the charting of a city, county, or other political subdivision into grid segments according to the invention.
  • Figure 9 is a pictorial representation fo a fifth embodiment system according to the invention.
  • FIG. 10 is a block diagram of a ground station employed in the system shown in Figure 9.
  • a preferred embodiment of the invention is directed to a vehicle location and collision avoidance system and method whereby an aircraft or other vehicle sends a digitally encoded data message to other aircraft or vehicles and to ground receiving locations during a uniquely defined time slot.
  • the data message preferably includes position coordinates and other appropriate information, such as altitude, vehicle type, speed, and heading.
  • the vehicle receives latitude and longitude coordinates of its position, together with a precise timing signal, from an existing satellite positioning system such as the Global Position System (GPS) or the Global Orbiting Navigational Satellite System (GLONASS).
  • GPS Global Position System
  • GLONASS Global Orbiting Navigational Satellite System
  • the acronym GPS will be used hereinafter to mean either or both of these systems, or any successor systems, including differential GPS.
  • the vehicle location system uses the position information to create the unique time slot for each vehicle position.
  • the vehicle location system includes a charting system that divides all or part of the entire global surface into grid segments having predetermined dimensions in latitude and longitude, measured in degrees, minutes, and seconds, or subdivisions thereof.
  • This charting system is based on a reference frame used by the GPS known as the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84), developed by the Defense Mapping Agency, United States Department of Defense.
  • WGS 84 World Geodetic System 1984
  • the vehicle location system assigns a reference waypoint to each grid segment at a predetermined surface location within the grid segment, extending skyward from that point.
  • a latitude generator aboard each aircraft or vehicle generates synthetic latitude functions, time mapped onto each grid segment in accordance with a predetermined time period and sequence.
  • a longitude generator aboard each aircraft or vehicle generates synthetic longitude functions, time mapped onto each grid segment in accordance with a predetermined time period and sequence.
  • An altitude generator aboard each aircraft generates synthetic altitude functions, time mapped onto each grid segment in accordance with a predetermined time period and sequence.
  • the vehicle location system includes a positioning receiver that receives information identifying the position of the vehicle from the GPS.
  • a conversion system converts the position information and altitude to relative position information identifying the vehicle's position with respect to the reference waypoint of the grid segment.
  • a controller correlates the relative position within a grid segment with the synthetic latitude, longitude and altitude functions, and assigns a unique time slot to an aircraft or vehicle based upon its relative position within the grid segment.
  • a transmitter transmits a digitally encoded data message containing position and other appropriate information within the assigned time slot.
  • the charting system; latitude, longitude, and altitude generators; conversion system; and controller are software programs executed by a microcomputer aboard each vehicle.
  • Figure 1 pictorially represents a parent aircraft 10 and a target aircraft 12 in an airspace covered by a conventional GPS system 14.
  • the aircraft use position signals 15 received from the GPS as shown so that each aircraft 10, 12 knows its own latitude and longitude.
  • Aircraft data messages 16 provided accorded to the invention are shown passing between the aircraft and provide each aircraft with the other aircraft's position within the airspace and other appropriate information, such as altitude, vehicle type, speed, and heading. The transmissions occur at unique time slots to avoid interference.
  • the present invention is not limited to aircraft or aircraft-related systems, but may also include automobiles, boats, spacecraft, and other navigable vehicles.
  • the data messages can be passed directly between the aircraft or via a conventional communication satellite 17.
  • the system 18 includes a global positioning system (GPS) receiver 20 that receives signals from three or more GPS satellites (not shown), each signal including a precise timing value, from which the GPS receiver calculates the latitude, longitude, and altitude of the vehicle .
  • GPS global positioning system
  • the GPS receiver 20 passes the vehicle position information and the timing signal to a microcomputer 22.
  • the microcomputer calculates a unique time slot for the vehicle based on the relative position of the vehicle with respect to a reference waypoint.
  • the microcomputer 22 passes the position information received from the GPS receiver 20 to a beacon transmitter 24 which transmits the position information to other vehicles or to fixed traffic controller stations during the unique time slot calculated by the microcomputer.
  • traffic control stations equipped with this system can intercept the transmitted data messages and display the positions of the transmitting aircraft, enabling vehicle traffic control.
  • the microcomputer 22 sends the position information to a communications satellite transmitter 26 for transmission to traffic control stations via communications satellites.
  • Discrete channels can be assigned to each separate traffic control area to eliminate transmissions from vehicles outside the traffic control area.
  • the system 18 includes a beacon receiver 28 that receives position data messages from the fixed ground stations and from other vehicles. These data messages are supplied to the microcomputer 22 which mathematically determines the bearing and distance of all aircraft and/or ground stations from which the data messages are received.
  • the microcomputer 18 provides output signals to a display system 30, which displays the positions of the aircraft and/or ground stations within some predetermined range. If the target aircraft is within a predetermined minimum distance, then the microcomputer triggers an audible warning system 32, causing the warning system to emit an audible warning signal notifying the vehicle pilot or driver of the nearby aircraft.
  • the microcomputer causes a warning display system 34 to display the bearing, range, and altitude of the target vehicle.
  • FIG 3 Shown in Figure 3 is a vehicle location method 36 according to a first embodiment of the present invention.
  • step 38 the area in which the vehicle can possibly operate is charted into numerous grid segments 39.
  • the operating area is the entire surface of the earth, a portion of which is shown in Figure 4.
  • Grid segment dimensions are set at one degree per side for this embodiment, although a different dimension may be used. This produces a total of 129600 grid segments 39, starting at the zero meridian of longitude and running eastward and westward to the 180th meridian, and starting at the equator and running northward and southward from the equator to the poles, as illustrated in Figure 4.
  • the linear distances associated with degrees of latitude remain constant over the global surface but linear distances associated with degrees of longitude decrease for those grid segments charted north and south of the equator.
  • the dimensions of each grid segment are constant in degrees, minutes, and seconds of latitude and longitude.
  • Each grid segment dimension in this embodiment can be stated as 1 degree, or 60 minutes, or 3600 seconds of latitude and longitude respectively.
  • Each grid segment is assigned a reference waypoint 40 in latitude and longitude representing the northernmost and westernmost point of the grid segment.
  • a vehicle's position within the grid segment in which it is navigating, relative to the reference waypoint, uniquely assigns the vehicle a time slot in which to transmit.
  • Time slot dimensions depend on the transmission capability of the data link system used to transmit and receive data packets.
  • the beacon transmitter 24 and the beacon receiver 28 of the present invention use an airborne component of the Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System/Mode Select (ATCRBS/Mode S), which has a 1 Megabit/sec capacity for transmitting, and its data packet is 112 bits long, plus an 8 usec preamble. This requires a time slot approximately 123 usec long.
  • the total number of time slots depends on the scan time, or the time interval that elapses between an individual aircraft's data packet transmissions. For this embodiment 7 seconds has been selected, although a different scan rate may be chosen. Thus, this embodiment has 1,000,000/123 time slots per second times 7 seconds, or 56,910 time slots.
  • step 41 of the method shown in Figure 3 these time slots are then mapped onto each grid segment 39.
  • the x-axis mapping function is called a synthetic longitude function and the y-axis mapping function is called a synthetic latitude function in this invention.
  • the time slot mapping onto each grid segment has been selected to be 238 rows by 238 columns per grid segment as shown in Figure 5. It should be noted that Figure 5 shows 10 rows and 10 columns, with each row representing 23.8 actual rows and each column representing 23.8 actual columns. Each grid segment is mapped starting at the reference waypoint and proceeding from left to right by rows. This produces an actual count of 56,644 time slots, each 123.57 usec long.
  • This mapping protocol ensures that the maximum position change required to shift time slots is 1,531.76 feet, or approximately 0.25 nautical miles along either the latitude or the longitude axis.
  • the corresponding latitude or longitude increment required to shift time slots is 15.12 seconds of latitude or longitude (3600 seconds per degree ⁇ 238 rows or columns).
  • Different scan rates would require different position changes to shift time slots.
  • a discussion of the mathematical relationships involved in mapping according to synthetic longitude and latitude functions may be helpful at this point. Consider the area represented by a grid segment, mapped by relative longitude and latitude with respect to a reference waypoint within the grid segment. Consider the same area represented by the same grid segment, mapped by a synthetic longitude and latitude function relative to the same reference waypoint.
  • These synthetic longitude and latitude functions are a scale transformation of the relative longitude and latitude mapping described above, each starting from a common origin.
  • the synthetic longitude and latitude mapping functions are correlated to the relative longitude and latitude mapping of a grid segment by the scale factor, B, (238/3600 for the preferred embodiment) in such a manner that a vehicle's relative position uniquely determines a synthetic longitude value and a synthetic latitude value.
  • the reciprocal of the scale factor (3600/238 or 15.12) determines the increment of position change in relative longitude and latitude required to shift one unit on the synthetic longitude or latitude scale.
  • Equation (3) sets the product of the maximum values of the synthetic longitude and latitude functions u, v, to the maximum number of time slots, of the required slot length, that can be accommodated within one system scan time period.
  • a system scan time period is defined as the time period between repetitive cycles through the sequentially mapped time slots.
  • the time required to transmit a data message is determined by the message length, in bits, and the bit rate transmission capability of the data link system used to transmit the data message.
  • the system scan time period divided by the length of time required to transmit a single aircraft data message, determines the maximum number of data messages that can be transmitted during one scan time period. This number establishes the maximum number of time slots that can be mapped by the synthetic longitude and latitude functions. If symmetry of the synthetic longitude and latitude functions is desired, then the square root of this number yields the maximum number of units of such synthetic longitude and latitude.
  • This correlation permits the sequential mapping of time slots onto the area represented by the grid segment such that the start of each time slot corresponds to an integral set of synthetic longitude and latitude coordinates and, through the scale factor, also corresponds to a set of relative longitude and latitude coordinates.
  • This correspondence permits the system described in the first embodiment to uniquely assign a time slot to a vehicle occupying the position that corresponds to those coordinates, during which it transmits a data message.
  • the longitude and latitude of the vehicle are received from the GPS in step 42.
  • the appropriate reference waypoint for a grid segment is selected automatically by the microcomputer 22 using the actual position data obtained from the GPS receiver 20.
  • westerly longitude and northerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded up to the next whole degree to find the reference waypoint longitude or latitude value.
  • Easterly longitude and southerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded down to the next whole degree to obtain the reference waypoint longitude or latitude value.
  • step 46 the relative position of the vehicle within a grid segment is found by subtracting the actual latitude and longitude of the vehicle's position from that of the reference waypoint of that grid segment, and using the absolute value of the result.
  • the range of relative latitude and longitude values is 0 to 3600 seconds and is identical for all grid segments. This permits identical time mapping of the synthetic functions on each grid segment, regardless of the grid segments location on the global surface.
  • a synthetic altitude function which is a scale transformation of actual altitude, is defined by equation (4) in a manner similar to the synthetic longitude and latitude functions:
  • the scale factor, C transforms actual altitude, w, into the synthetic altitude function, z.
  • C equals 60/40000.
  • the reciprocal of the scale factor determines the increment of altitude change required to change one unit on the synthetic altitude scale.
  • the scale factor, B used to define the synthetic longitude and latitude functions u, v, for the second embodiment is 80/3600.
  • the product of the maximum value of the three functions, u, v, and z is set equal to one system scan time period, divided by the length of time required to transmit one aircraft data message.
  • Equation (5) sets the product of the maximum values of the three synthetic functions u,v,z, equal to the maximum number of time slots that can be accommodated in one system scan time period.
  • Embodiment two employs a scan time period and data link system that provides 400,000 time slots. Dividing this number of time slots by 60 and taking the square root of the quotient produces a 60 unit synthetic altitude function, representing 60 altitude levels up to and including 40,000 feet and above as the final upper level, and symmetrical synthetic longitude and latitude functions of 80 units each, mapping each of these altitude levels.
  • This correlation permits the sequential mapping of the time slots onto the volume over the grid segment such that the start of each time slot corresponds to an integral set of synthetic longitude, latitude, and altitude coordinates and, through the scale factors, also corresponds to a set of relative longitude, latitude, and altitude coordinates.
  • This correspondence permits the system described in embodiment two to uniquely assign a time slot to an aircraft occupying the position that corresponds to those coordinates, during which it transmits a data message.
  • the latitude synthetic function (y coordinate axis) has 238 rows, each row being 29411.76 usec long.
  • This function preferably is represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 238 addresses, of which the first is set to zero and each successive address contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 29411.76.
  • the longitude synthetic function (x coordinate axis) has 238 columns along a row each 123.57 usec wide.
  • This function is represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 238 addresses, of which the first is set to 123.57 and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 123.57.
  • Each of these tables is entered into at an address calculated by dividing the vehicle's relative latitude in seconds within a grid segment by the increment of latitude required to shift rows, i.e., 15.12 (3600/238), for the latitude table, and its relative longitude in seconds, within a grid segment, by the increment of longitude required to shift columns, or 15.12, for the longitude table.
  • 15.12 3600/238
  • step 48 the microcomputer 22 computes a time slot for the vehicle.
  • the countdown of the counter is started simultaneously for all vehicles by the microcomputer 22 using the precise clock synchronizing signal received from the GPS receiver 20.
  • the microcomputer 22 causes the vehicle, using the Mode S Beacon Transmitter 24, to transmit a data message, previously described, within this uniquely defined time slot (step 50). This occurs repetitively at the scan rate, or once each 7 seconds, for all vehicles.
  • the microcomputer 22 can be programmed to reset the scans for all aircraft to begin at 0000 Greenwich Mean Time, derived from GPS time, by leaping over the fractional scan period. As each vehicle's position changes within the grid segment, the time slot in which it transmits a data message also changes. As long as vehicles are separated from each other by a horizontal distance greater than .25 nautical mile along the latitude or longitude axis, there will be no overlap in aircraft transmissions.
  • Computer tracking logic currently used in ground air traffic control locations, uses position, altitude, speed, and heading data to project a vehicle's track as a function of time, in order to predict position conflicts and potential collisions. This logic can also be used to predict simultaneous vehicle transmissions within the same time slot, since each time slot assignment is a function of a vehicle's position. Each conflicting vehicle's time slot assignment can then be shifted slightly by its tracking logic to prevent this occurrence. Vehicles in grid segments farther away will be outside communication range.
  • the grid segment time mapping protocol together with a vehicle's relative position within a grid segment, assigns the time slot during which an aircraft transmits a data message containing position data in latitude and longitude, altitude data (if any), and a vehicle identification code. Other data such as heading and speed may also be transmitted. While the vehicle's relative position with respect to the reference waypoint is used to assign a transmission time slot to the vehicle, this is not the position data that is transmitted to other vehicles and to fixed locations. Actual latitude and longitude obtained from the GPS is transmitted and may then be referred to the waypoints or to any other reference system for display or navigational purposes.
  • the system 18 shown in Figure 2 can provide each vehicle with information regarding nearby vehicles in order to avoid collisions.
  • Shown in Figure 6 is a method 52 used by the system 18 to avoid collisions between vehicles.
  • the beacon receiver 28 ( Figure 2) of the parent aircraft 10 ( Figure 1) receives a data message from a target aircraft 12 ( Figure 1).
  • the data message includes the latitude and longitude of the target aircraft and may also include other information such as altitude, bearing, speed, and an aircraft ID.
  • the microcomputer 22 of the parent aircraft computes the distance between the parent and target aircraft using the latitude, longitude, and altitude (if any) of the respective aircraft.
  • the microcomputer 22 determines whether the target aircraft is within a predetermined threshold distance from the parent aircraft.
  • the microcomputer 22 causes the audible warning system 32 and the warning display system 34 to warn the vehicle pilot or driver of the intruding target aircraft.
  • the warning display system displays the bearing, range, and altitude of the intruding target aircraft.
  • the microcomputer causes the display system 30 to display the position of the target aircraft in step 62.
  • the microcomputer 22 can determine whether to issue a warning to the pilot by calculating whether the target aircraft is within a predetermined threshold time from colliding with the parent aircraft. Such a potential collision time can be calculated based on the bearing and speed of the target aircraft in addition to the distance of the target aircraft from the parent aircraft.
  • the system described above can be used by properly equipped aircraft, ships, trains and other vehicles in an identical manner. Different beacon frequencies will be required to prevent commingling with the vehicle system transmissions, and discrete Communication Satellite channels will be required to transmit position data to the appropriate display locations. Trucks, busses, and automobiles that are properly equipped can also use the system for transmitting location data to a remote display point via a discrete Communication Satellite Channel, however, the beacon transmission would not be required.
  • the vehicle location and collision avoidance system 18 assigns a time slot for each aircraft based on the aircraft's altitude in addition to its latitude and longitude.
  • the hardware used for the second embodiment is the same as that used for the first embodiment ( Figure 2).
  • the GPS receiver 20 calculates the aircraft's altitude, longitude, and latitude from the GPS signals received from the GPS satellites and the microcomputer 22 assigns a time slot for the aircraft based on the aircraft's relative position within a three-dimensional grid segment. Grid segment charting and reference waypoint assignment for this embodiment is identical to that of the first embodiment.
  • a third axis (z coordinate axis) representing altitude can be added to the invention if the data link transmission rate is improved or if longer scan time periods are used.
  • the airborne beacon transmission capability is increased to 4 Mbit/Sec, comparable to the ground transmitter component of the Mode S beacon system, and the scan time is increased to 12 seconds.
  • Transmitting a 112 bit data packet plus a 2 usec preamble at this higher bit rate requires a time slot length of approximately 30 usec.
  • Dividing one scan time interval by 30 usec produces 400,000 time slots. These time slots are mapped to the three coordinates in a manner that ensures that the horizontal position change required to shift time slots is minimized, and the vertical position change required to shift time slots is less than the altitude separation used for air traffic control. Dividing this total number of time slots by 60 and allocating the 60 slices to the volume over the grid segment, produces 60 altitude bands each containing 6,666 time slots.
  • Each of these bands represents a 666.67 foot altitude increment, and, in this embodiment, the altitude synthetic function is mapped to 40,000 feet.
  • the latitude and longitude coordinates are chosen as 80 by 80 for symmetry.
  • the resulting time mapping of coordinates is then 80 by 80 by 60 which produces 384,000 time slots, each 31.25 usec long.
  • the position change required to shift time slots is 4,557 feet or approximately .75 nautical mile along either the latitude or longitude axis, or 666.67 feet of altitude change along the altitude axis.
  • Corresponding changes of latitude and longitude to shift time slots is 45 seconds of latitude or longitude.
  • time slot mapping is accomplished starting at the reference waypoint at the surface, mapping from left to right by rows, and after each altitude band is mapped, moving up 666.67 feet to the next altitude band and repeating the same sequence until the volume above the grid segment is mapped up to 40,000 feet. All of the few aircraft able to fly above 40,000 feet will be assigned 40,000 feet of altitude when flying above that level for purposes of time slot assignment.
  • the appropriate reference waypoint for a grid segment is selected automatically by the microcomputer 22 using the aircraft's actual position data obtained from the GPS Receiver 20.
  • westerly longitude and northerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded up to the next whole degree to find the reference waypoint longitude or latitude value.
  • Easterly longitude and southerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded down to the next whole degree to obtain the reference waypoint longitude or latitude value.
  • Relative position within a grid segment is found by subtracting the actual latitude and longitude of the aircraft's position from that of the reference waypoint of that grid segment, and using the absolute value of the result.
  • the range of relative latitude and longitude values is 0 to 3600 seconds and is identical for all grid segments. This permits identical time mapping of the synthetic functions on each grid segment, regardless of the grid segments location on the global surface.
  • the latitude synthetic function (y coordinate axis) has 80 rows each
  • This function can be represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 80 addresses, of which the first is set to zero and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 2500.
  • the longitude synthetic function (x coordinate axis) has 80 columns along a row each 31.25 usec wide.
  • This function can be represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 80 addresses, of which the first is set to 31.25 and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 31.25.
  • Each of these tables is entered into at an address calculated by dividing the aircraft's relative latitude in seconds, within a grid segment, by the increment of latitude required to shift rows, or 45, for the latitude table, and its relative longitude in seconds, within a grid segment, by the increment of longitude required to shift columns, or 45, for the longitude table.
  • the result in each case, discarding any remainder which selects the time slot at its beginning, will be an integral number ranging from 1 to 80.
  • the altitude synthetic function (z coordinate axis) has 60 levels, each encompassing 200,000 usec of the scan time period. This function can be represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 60 addresses, of which the first is set to zero and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 200,000.
  • This table is entered into at an address calculated by dividing the aircraft's altitude, provided by the GPS, by 666.67, the altitude increment of change required to shift time slots. The result, discarding any remainder which selects the altitude level at its beginning, will be an integral number ranging from 1 to 60.
  • the microcomputer 22 causes the aircraft, using the beacon transmitter 24, to transmit a data message, previously described, within this uniquely defined time slot. This occurs repetitively at the scan rate or, once each 12 seconds for all aircraft. As each aircraft's position changes within the grid segment volume, the time slot in which it transmits a data message also changes. As long as aircraft are separated from each other by a distance greater than .75 nautical mile along the latitude or longitude axis, or by an altitude greater than 666.67 feet, there will be no overlap in aircraft transmissions.
  • a smaller scale charting of grid segments onto an airport area can be used to show the ground location of aircraft on the airport surface and such information can be provided to other aircraft for display, and to the control tower for display and control of aircraft ground movements.
  • a separate beacon transmitter and receiver frequency will be required, to which all aircraft would be directed to switch, upon landing or upon pushback from the terminal, to prevent interference with the airborne system previously described.
  • Shown in Figure 6 is an airport area 64 six minutes of latitude by six minutes of longitude, the boundaries of which are coincident with integral minutes of latitude and longitude. Of course, different dimensions could be used to map different areas.
  • This area is centered on an airport 66, as precisely as possible, and divided into grid segments 67 of 20 seconds of latitude by 20 seconds of longitude. This will produce 324 small scale grid segments as shown in Figure 7.
  • Small scale charting together with a very short scan rate is required due to the close proximity of aircraft on an airport.
  • a 1 -second scan time is selected for this embodiment.
  • the data being transmitted in this embodiment is an aircraft identifier and position coordinates.
  • a reasonable time slot length of 123 usec. is selected.
  • the bandwidth of the airborne beacon transmitter 24 ( Figure 2), the number of time slots possible for a one second scan rate is 1,000,000/123 or 8,130.
  • the time slot mapping onto each grid segment has been selected to be 90 rows by 90 columns per grid segment. This produces an actual count of 8,100 grid slots, each 123.45 usec long.
  • This mapping protocol ensures that the maximum position change required to shift time slots is 22.5 feet along either the latitude or the longitude axis.
  • the corresponding latitude or longitude increment required to change time slots is 222.22 milliseconds of latitude or longitude.
  • the appropriate reference waypoint for a grid segment is selected automatically by the microcomputer 22 using the aircraft's actual position data obtained from the GPS receiver 20.
  • a protocol for accomplishing this is as follows: westerly longitude and northerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded up to the next whole multiple of 20 seconds to obtain the reference waypoint latitude or longitude value. Easterly longitude and southerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded down to the next whole multiple of 20 seconds to obtain the reference waypoint latitude or longitude value.
  • Relative position within a grid segment is found by subtracting the actual latitude and longitude of the aircraft's position from that of the reference waypoint of that grid segment, and using the absolute value of the result.
  • the range of relative latitude and longitude values is 0 to 20 seconds and is identical for all grid segments. This permits identical time mapping of the synthetic functions on each grid segment, regardless of the grid segments location in the area charted around the airport.
  • the latitude synthetic function (y coordinate axis) has 90 rows each 11,111.11 usec long. This function can be represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 90 addresses, of which the first is set to zero and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 11,111.11.
  • the longitude synthetic function (x coordinate axis) has 90 columns along a row each 123.45 usec wide. This function can be represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 90 addresses, of which the first is set to 123.45 and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 123.45.
  • Each of these tables is entered into at an address calculated by dividing the aircraft's relative latitude in milliseconds, within a grid segment, by 222.22, for the latitude table, and its relative longitude in milliseconds, within a grid segment, by 222.22, for the longitude table. The result in each case, discarding any remainder which selects the time slot at its beginning, will be an integral number ranging from 1 to 90.
  • the sum of the contents of the selected table addresses of the latitude synthetic function and the longitude synthetic function, discarding any fractional component, represents a mapped time slot within the grid segment and can be used to set a timing counter in the microcomputer 22.
  • the countdown of the timing counter is started simultaneously for all aircraft on the airport by the microcomputer 22 using the precise clock synchronizing signal received by the GPS receiver 20.
  • the microcomputer 22 causes the aircraft, using its beacon transmitter 24, to transmit its aircraft ID and position coordinates, within its uniquely defined time slot. This occurs repetitively at the scan rate or, once each second for all aircraft on the airport surface. As each aircraft's position changes within the grid segment, the time slot in which it transmits data also changes.
  • Each receiving aircraft and the air traffic control tower of the airport receive the data messages by way of its respective beacon receiver 24. These data messages are supplied to the microcomputer 22 which mathematically determines the bearing and distance of all aircraft from which data messages are received, the microcomputer 22 causes the display system 30, to display the position of all aircraft from which messages are received, permitting pilots to know the position of all moving aircraft on the airport and permitting the control tower to control the movement of aircraft on the airport.
  • a smaller scale charting of grid segments onto an area can be used to show the location of police and emergency vehicles and such information can be provided to a fixed control point for display and control of vehicle movements.
  • Shown in Figure 8 is a metropolitan area 68 thirty minutes of latitude by 30 minutes of longitude, the boundaries of which are coincident with integral minutes of latitude and longitude. However, different dimensions could be used.
  • This area is centered on the city or county, as precisely as possible, and divided into grid segments of 1 minute of latitude by 1 minute of longitude, thereby producing 900 small scale grid segments 70. Small scale charting is necessary to increase position accuracy.
  • a time slot length of 123 usec is selected. Assuming a 1 Mbit/Sec capacity of the Communication Satellite channel, the number of time slots possible for a 90 second scan time is 90,000,000/123 or 731707. Although a 90 second scan time is selected for this embodiment, a shorter scan time could be used for a more rapid position update.
  • the time slot mapping onto each grid segment has been selected to be 855 rows by 855 columns per grid segment. This produces an actual count of 731025 grid slots, each 123.11 usec. long. This mapping protocol ensures that the maximum position change required to shift time slots is 7.1 feet along either the latitude or the longitude axis.
  • the corresponding latitude or longitude increment required to change time slots is 70.17 milliseconds of latitude or longitude.
  • the system functions identically to the airborne system described in the first embodiment and uses the same equipment, shown in Figure 2.
  • the ground-based system of the fourth embodiment is isolated from the airborne system of the first embodiment by use of a separate communication satellite transmitter channel or, by use of a broadband ground communication system. Transmission via the beacon transmitter 24 is not required for this embodiment.
  • the appropriate reference waypoint for a grid segment is selected automatically by the microcomputer 22 using the vehicle's actual position data obtained from the GPS receiver 20.
  • a protocol for accomplishing this is as follows: westerly longitude and northerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded up to the next whole minute to obtain the reference waypoint latitude or longitude value. Easterly longitude and southerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded down to the next whole minute to obtain the reference waypoint latitude or longitude value.
  • Relative position within a grid segment is found by subtracting the actual latitude and longitude of the vehicles position from that of the reference waypoint of that grid segment, and using the absolute value of the result.
  • the range of relative latitude and longitude values is 0 to 60,000 milliseconds and is identical for all grid segments. This permits identical time mapping of the synthetic functions on each grid segment, regardless of the grid segments location in the area.
  • the latitude synthetic function (y coordinate axis) has 855 rows each 105263.15 usec long. This function can be represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 855 addresses, of which the first is set to zero and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 105,263.15.
  • the longitude synthetic function (x coordinate axis) has 855 columns along a row each 123.11 usec wide. This function can be represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 855 addresses, of which the first is set to 123.11 and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 123.11.
  • Each of these tables is entered into at an address calculated by dividing the vehicles relative latitude in milliseconds, within a grid segment, by 70.17, for the latitude table, and its relative longitude in milliseconds, within a grid segment, by 70.17, for the longitude table. The result in each case, discarding any remainder which selects the time slot at its beginning, will be an integral number ranging from 1 to 855.
  • the sum of the contents of the selected table addresses of the latitude synthetic function and the longitude synthetic function, discarding any fractional component, represents a mapped time slot within the grid segment and can be used to set a timing counter in the microcomputer 22.
  • the countdown of the timing counter is started simultaneously for all vehicles within the area by the microcomputer 22 using the precise clock synchronizing signal received from the Global Positioning System 14 by GPS receiver 20.
  • the microcomputer 22 causes the vehicle, using the communication satellite transmitter 26, to transmit its vehicle ID and position coordinates within its uniquely defined time slot. This occurs repetitively at the scan rate, or once each 90 seconds, for all vehicles within the area.
  • the time slot in which it transmits data also changes.
  • a fixed control station receives the data messages by way of a communication satellite receiver similar to the beacon receiver 28 shown in Figure 2.
  • the control station uses the data contained in the data messages to display the position of all vehicles from which messages are received, permitting the control station to control the movement of vehicles in the area.
  • the first through fourth embodiments may not be sufficiently accurate.
  • Such suboptimum accuracy can be caused be many factors, such as atmospheric distortion and military-imposed periodic inaccuracies with the GPS system.
  • the military imposes such inaccuracies to prevent hostile users from using the GPS system to guide missiles launched against U.S. targets.
  • the military does not oppose persons skilled in the art to develop methods to overcome the military-imposed inaccuracies on a local, line-of- sight basis, so that the GPS can be used by commercial aircraft without affecting the military's ability to stop such hostile use.
  • the fifth embodiment discussed herein is such a method that overcomes military-imposed and other inaccuracies and provides a higher degree of accuracy than does standard GPS.
  • the fifth embodiment is directed to a method and system for providing highly accurate guidance to a vehicle, such as an aircraft approaching an airport runway.
  • the fifth embodiment calculates a differential GPS correction factor that is used to adjust the vehicle location calculated using the GPS system in the first through fourth embodiments.
  • the fifth embodiment system includes three ground stations: station A 72, station B 74, and station C 76, located at precisely surveyed positions within an area surrounding an airport 78 as shown in Figure 9. These stations may be separated by a few miles, up to tens of miles, but should be located so as to provide a good Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP) to an aircraft 80 on approach to any runway on the airport. Three is the minimum number of stations that will provide three dimensional position coordinates to a receiving aircraft, however only one station is required for differential corrections of ranges.
  • the fifth embodiment uses the GPS system which includes a set of 24 navigational satellites 82 spaced above the surface of the earth.
  • Each ground station 72-76 is substantially similar to the vehicle location and collision avoidance system of Figure 2, as shown in Figure 10. As such, the items shown in Figure 10 are discussed herein only to the extent that they differ from the system of Figure 2.
  • Each of the ground stations has three multi-channel GPS Receivers 20A-C, each of which is capable of tracking and measuring the pseudo-range to multiple satellites simultaneously.
  • the pseudo-range refers to the travel time of a GPS signal from a satellite to the ground station multiplied by the speed of light. The travel time is computed by recording the time that the signal arrives at the ground station and subtracting from that recorded time the time at which the signal leaves the satellite, which is included in each GPS signal.
  • the calculated range is referred to as pseudo-range because of errors in the calculated range caused by atmospheric disturbances in the GPS signal.
  • a microcomputer 22 at each ground station 72-76 allocates visible GPS satellites to three GPS receivers 20 in each ground station. Each GPS receiver is assigned GPS satellites until all visible GPS satellites are assigned, with a maximum of four satellites per GPS receiver. The GPS satellites assigned to each GPS receiver are selected to obtain a good Geometric Dilution Of Precision (GDOP). As is known in the art, the GDOP is a mathematical calculation of the angular dispersion between the GPS satellites selected.
  • GDOP Geometric Dilution Of Precision
  • the three GPS receivers 20A-C make pseudo-range measurements (actually travel time measurements and pseudo-range calculations) to each of their assigned satellites simultaneously at a predetermined time known as the GPS epoch, which preferably occurs every six seconds.
  • Each GPS receiver calculates uncorrected position coordinates for the ground station from the calculated pseudo-ranges.
  • the GPS receivers used the Earth Centered, Earth Fixed (ECEF) coordinate system to express the position coordinates.
  • the GPS receivers send the position coordinates to the microcomputer 22, which causes the beacon transmitter 24 to transmit the coordinates in a data message, described below, during it's assigned time slot.
  • each GPS satellite at each GPS epoch is calculated by the GPS receiver using parameters contained in the navigational data message transmitted by the GPS satellite, the location being known as an ephemeris.
  • a pseudo-range (Rjj(+)) between each GPS satellite (j) and each ground station (i) can be calculated using the following equation 1 :
  • the data message sent by the beacon transmitter 24 changes with each successive time slot for each ground station 72-76.
  • a first data message includes an identification address of the ground station, the uncorrected position coordinates of the ground station calculated by the first GPS receiver 20A, Pseudo-Random Noise (PRN) code numbers of the four satellites assigned to the first GPS receiver 20, and the epoch time at which the pseudo-range measurements to each satellite were made.
  • PRN Pseudo-Random Noise
  • the second data message includes the ground station's identification address, the uncorrected position coordinates of the ground station calculated by the second GPS Receiver 20, the PRN code numbers of the four satellites assigned to the second GPS Receiver 20, and the epoch time at which the pseudo-range measurements to each satellite were made.
  • the microcomputer 22 then causes the beacon transmitter 24 to transmit a third data message during the next assigned time slot for the ground station.
  • the third data message includes the ground station's address, the uncorrected position coordinates of the ground station calculated by the third GPS Receiver 20, the PRN code numbers of the satellites used by the third GPS Receiver 20, and the epoch time at which the pseudo-range measurements to each satellite were made.
  • the sequence of data messages requires three time slots for each ground station 72-76.
  • the sequence repeats using the same data that was transmitted in the previous sequence.
  • each receiving aircraft has two opportunities to receive position data from each ground station based on all satellites, taken four at a time.
  • the two sequences require 6 time slots, or six seconds, at which time a new GPS epoch occurs.
  • new simultaneous pseudo-range and uncorrected position coordinate calculations are made as described above, and the sequences are repeated using the new uncorrected position coordinates.
  • An aircraft 80 receives the data messages from each ground station 72- 76 and uses the information in the data message to calculate the GPS correction factor that is used to adjust the GPS-derived aircraft location discussed above with respect to the first through fourth embodiments.
  • the aircraft microcomputer 22 begins the GPS correction factor calculation by recalculating the pseudo-range for each visible GPS satellite using the uncorrected position coordinates for each ground station and the ephemeris of each satellite plugged in to equation 1. To ensure that the correct ephemeris is available, the aircraft microcomputer 22 and the microcomputer 22 in each ground station 72-76 maintain a running history table of epoch time and associated ephemeris for each GPS satellite, for the current epoch and three preceding epochs.
  • the epoch and it's associated ephemeris for each GPS satellite are placed at the top of the table and each preceding epoch and it's associated ephemeris for each GPS satellite are moved down in the table. The oldest epoch and it's associated ephemerides are eliminated.
  • the microcomputer 22 of the aircraft 80 uses the surveyed position coordinates of each ground station (si) and the ephemerides of the satellites (j) assigned to the ground station to compute the actual ranges (R s ji) using the following equation 2:
  • Equation 2 is used to compute the actual range of each satellite assigned to each ground station.
  • the difference between the calculated pseudo-range and the calculated actual range from the ground station to each of the satellites is the GPS correction factor applicable to the pseudo-range for any aircraft in the vicinity of the ground stations 72-76.
  • the GPS correction factor can be determined by the following equation
  • the beacon receiver 28 ( Figure 2) of each receiving aircraft 80 receives the data messages from each ground station 72-76, transmitted during the ground station's assigned time slot by the ground station's beacon transmitter 24.
  • the GPS correction factor for each visible satellite is calculated as described above.
  • all vehicles receiving the data messages of any one of the ground stations have all the data needed to make differential corrections to pseudo- ranges calculated for the vehicles and each satellite in view.
  • Each vehicle need only to select the GPS correction factors applicable to the satellites being used by it's GPS Receiver 20, which are identified by the PRN code numbers broadcast in each ground station data message.
  • each aircraft on approach receives the transmitted data messages from each ground station 72-76 via the aircraft's beacon receiver 28.
  • the beacon receiver passes the data messages to the aircraft's microcomputer 22, which identifies each of the ground stations by its identification address in the data messages.
  • the microcomputer uses the identification address to select precisely surveyed coordinates of the identified ground station from its non-volatile memory.
  • the microcomputer marks and stores the time of reception of each data message using GPS time supplied by the aircraft's GPS receiver 20.
  • the receiving aircraft's microcomputer 22 computes the time of transmission of the data messages from each of the ground stations by determining the time slot during which the transmission occurred.
  • the microcomputer determines the ground station's time slot by identifying the grid segment and the relative position in the grid segment in which the stored surveyed coordinates of the ground station are located. Such a determination is identical to that made by each ground station in determining the correct time slot in which to transmit its data messages.
  • the time slot determination are accomplished as described above in the first through fourth embodiments.
  • the receiving aircraft's microcomputer 22 computes the transit time between the receiving aircraft and each transmitting ground station 72-76 by subtracting the computed time of data transmission from the stored time of data reception, and scales the result by the speed of light.
  • Each range is expressed in equation form in terms of the three known position coordinates of the ground station to which the range applies and the three unknown position coordinates of the receiving aircraft.
  • the aircraft microcomputer 22 solves the three equations simultaneously to determine the receiving aircraft's position in three dimensional space.
  • the position coordinates are used to display and update the aircraft's position during the approach. New solutions for the aircraft's position updates occur repetitively at the system scan rate.
  • the approach method described herein provides superior accuracy to aircraft on approaches than does the GPS. Since the position coordinates of the three ground stations are very accurately known, the position coordinates of the receiving aircraft derived by this method are not affected by inaccurate satellite vehicle ephemerides, nor by the truncation of ephemeris data employed while accuracy degradation, called selective availability, is being imposed by the military. The effect of clock dithering, also imposed by the military for the same purpose, is eliminated by the pseudo-range corrections calculated as described above.
  • the ellipsoid coordinate system associated with WGS-84 has the same origin as the Earth Centered, Earth Fixed (ECEF) cartesian coordinates of WGS-84, except that altitude (Z) dimension of the ECEF System begins at the center of the Earth while the altitude dimension of the ellipsoid system begins at sea level.
  • ECEF Earth Fixed
  • GPS receivers provide position output in ellipsoidal coordinates, that is, latitude, longitude, and altitude, even though the position computations take place in (ECEF) cartesian coordinates.
  • ECEF Earth Fixed

Abstract

A vehicle location system and method (18, 36) whereby the position coordinates of a vehicle (10) are made available to other vehicles (12) or to fixed locations (72, 74, 76) by transmission of a data message (50) containing position coordinates of the vehicle (10). The time slot (48) in which the data message is transmitted is uniquely assigned to each transmitting vehicle as a function of its position in a grid segment (39) with respect to a reference waypoint (40) assigned to that grid segment. Position information in latitude and longitude is provided to each receiving vehicle, together with a precise timing signal, by the Global Positioning System (GPS). A synthetic latitude function and a synthetic longitude function provide a periodic mapping (41) of a specific time period onto areas (64, 68) represented by grid segments (67, 70) charted on the global surface.

Description

Description
VEHICLE LOCATION AND COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM
Technical Field
This invention relates to systems and methods for providing and displaying vehicle collision avoidance information.
Background of the Invention Various prior systems provide information about the relative positions of aircraft in a particular airspace.
One system has ultra-precise, airborne clocks aboard each aircraft to provide precise synchronizing reference signals, and each aircraft is prompted to simultaneously transmit an identification signal. Distance between aircraft is determined by measurement of the elapsed time between the transmission of an identification signal and receipt of that signal. This system provides only distance information and does not provide relative bearing or position information. It is readily appreciated that maintenance of all of the ultra-precise, airborne clocks is difficult. All of the aircraft within an airspace transmit identification signals at the same time, causing interference and confusion so that the ability of this type of system to resolve one signal from a large number of other signals is limited.
Another system uses a cooperative interrogation and reply technique whereby an interrogating aircraft transmits a signal and measures the elapsed time between the transmission of the signal and the receipt of a reply signal from a responding aircraft. The ability of the system to resolve the signals from each of a large number of aircraft occupying the same airspace is also limited.
A system whereby each aircraft carries its own expensive scanning radar system obviously presents problems of economics, not to mention the severe clutter and jamming caused by a large number of such systems operating within the same airspace. Another system uses ground-based radar for determining the position of all aircraft within an airspace and transmits positional data to each aircraft by means of ground-based data transmission links. This system requires radar and data processing facilities which are not available in every geographic area.
Many of the prior location systems have nearly simultaneous signal transmissions from all the aircraft within a given airspace and create serious clutter and jamming problems when a large number of aircraft are present. It is recognized that conventional automatic direction finder systems and range measurement systems, such as the well-known VOR-DME and VOR-TACAN systems, enable an aircraft to accurately know its own angular bearing, or azimuth, and range with respect to a reference location. Many hyperbolic navigation systems, such as LORAN and DECCA, as well as various satellite-based systems, provide individual aircraft and other aircraft with their own positions. However, these systems do not provide an aircraft with information about the position of other aircraft in the same airspace so that collisions may be avoided.
One prior art system designed to overcome many of the problems of the prior art can be found in U.S. Patent No. 4,380,050, issued to Tanner. The Tanner patent is directed to a collision avoidance system that assigns time slots based on the relative azimuth and range of an aircraft with respect to a local ground-based VOR station. Each aircraft transmits a signal identifying its relative position with respect to the location of the VOR station. The system disclosed in the Tanner patent effectively avoids collisions, but requires other aircraft to convert the relative position signals into global position information such as latitude and longitude.
Summary of the Invention
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide an improved aircraft location system by which position information for all aircraft within an airspace is economically made available for display on board other aircraft and to fixed monitoring and control locations.
It is another object of this invention to provide a collision avoidance warning system for aircraft having conventional systems that determine the aircraft's positions in the airspace. It is another object of this invention to provide a passive airspace surveillance system for ground based air traffic control purposes.
It is another object of this invention to provide a ground monitoring and traffic control system for aircraft on the surface of an airport.
It is another object of this invention to provide an improved ship location system by which position information for all ships is economically made available for display on board other ships and at fixed monitoring locations.
It is another object of this invention to provide a collision avoidance warning system for ships having conventional systems that determine the ships' positions on the surface. It is another object of this invention to provide an improved vehicle location system by which position information for trains and other surface vehicles is economically made available for display on board other vehicles and at fixed monitoring locations.
It is another object of this invention to provide a collision avoidance warning system for surface vehicles having conventional systems that determine the vehicles' positions on the surface.
It is another object of this invention to provide a motor vehicle location system by which position information for all equipped motor vehicles is made available for display at fixed monitoring and control locations.
These and other objects are accomplished by a vehicle location and collision avoidance system of the present invention. Vehicle position information in latitude and longitude is provided to each receiving vehicle, together with a precise timing signal, by an existing satellite positioning system. A synthetic latitude function (y coordinate axis) and a synthetic longitude function (x coordinate axis) provide a periodic mapping of a specific time period onto areas represented by grid segments charted on the global surface. These synthetic functions are initiated and controlled by the precise timing signal from the satellite position system, and provide correlation between relative position and time slot mapping. Each grid segment is assigned a reference waypoint preferably originating at the northernmost and westernmost point of the grid segment, and extending skyward from that point. Using the position data in latitude and longitude supplied by the satellite positioning system, the vehicle's relative position in a grid segment with respect to the reference waypoint of that grid segment is determined mathematically. The vehicle's relative position in the grid segment is correlated to the time mapping of the grid segment provided by the synthetic functions. The vehicle transmits a digitally encoded data message during the corresponding mapped time slot of the grid segment. Since this time slot is uniquely assigned to the vehicle, interference caused by simultaneous transmissions from other vehicles is avoided. While the relative position within a grid segment is used to assign the transmission time slot, it is not the position data that is transmitted in the data message. Actual position data in latitude and longitude obtained from the satellite positioning system is transmitted in the data message. These -data are used to provide input to position displays and in cases where the vehicles are aircraft, to collision warning devices. In an alternate embodiment, a third axis representing altitude is used to create a three dimensional mapping of time slots over the volume of a grid segment.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Figure 1 is a pictorial representation of aircraft using a system according to the invention. Figure 2 is a block diagram of a system for receiving and transmitting location and other information according to the invention.
Figure 3 shows a vehicle location method applicable to all embodiments of the invention. Figure 4 shows a partial charting of grid segments into the southern hemisphere starting at the equator and at the zero meridian according to the invention.
Figure 5 is a rectangular plot representing the area mapped by a synthetic latitude functiona and a synthetic longitude function according to the invention, and illustrating the charting of the global surface into grid segments. Figure 6 is a method of computing the hazard of collision, triggering appropriate warnings, and displaying target aircraft according to the invention.
Figure 7 is a rectangular plot illustrating the charting of an airport surface into grid segments according to the invention.
Figure 8 is a rectangular plot illustrating the charting of a city, county, or other political subdivision into grid segments according to the invention.
Figure 9 is a pictorial representation fo a fifth embodiment system according to the invention.
Figure 10 is a block diagram of a ground station employed in the system shown in Figure 9.
Detailed Description of the Invention
A preferred embodiment of the invention is directed to a vehicle location and collision avoidance system and method whereby an aircraft or other vehicle sends a digitally encoded data message to other aircraft or vehicles and to ground receiving locations during a uniquely defined time slot. The data message preferably includes position coordinates and other appropriate information, such as altitude, vehicle type, speed, and heading. The vehicle receives latitude and longitude coordinates of its position, together with a precise timing signal, from an existing satellite positioning system such as the Global Position System (GPS) or the Global Orbiting Navigational Satellite System (GLONASS). The acronym GPS will be used hereinafter to mean either or both of these systems, or any successor systems, including differential GPS. The vehicle location system uses the position information to create the unique time slot for each vehicle position.
The vehicle location system includes a charting system that divides all or part of the entire global surface into grid segments having predetermined dimensions in latitude and longitude, measured in degrees, minutes, and seconds, or subdivisions thereof. This charting system is based on a reference frame used by the GPS known as the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84), developed by the Defense Mapping Agency, United States Department of Defense. The vehicle location system assigns a reference waypoint to each grid segment at a predetermined surface location within the grid segment, extending skyward from that point. A latitude generator aboard each aircraft or vehicle generates synthetic latitude functions, time mapped onto each grid segment in accordance with a predetermined time period and sequence. A longitude generator aboard each aircraft or vehicle generates synthetic longitude functions, time mapped onto each grid segment in accordance with a predetermined time period and sequence. An altitude generator aboard each aircraft generates synthetic altitude functions, time mapped onto each grid segment in accordance with a predetermined time period and sequence.
The vehicle location system includes a positioning receiver that receives information identifying the position of the vehicle from the GPS. A conversion system converts the position information and altitude to relative position information identifying the vehicle's position with respect to the reference waypoint of the grid segment. A controller correlates the relative position within a grid segment with the synthetic latitude, longitude and altitude functions, and assigns a unique time slot to an aircraft or vehicle based upon its relative position within the grid segment. A transmitter transmits a digitally encoded data message containing position and other appropriate information within the assigned time slot. Preferably, the charting system; latitude, longitude, and altitude generators; conversion system; and controller are software programs executed by a microcomputer aboard each vehicle.
Figure 1 pictorially represents a parent aircraft 10 and a target aircraft 12 in an airspace covered by a conventional GPS system 14. The aircraft use position signals 15 received from the GPS as shown so that each aircraft 10, 12 knows its own latitude and longitude. Aircraft data messages 16 provided accorded to the invention are shown passing between the aircraft and provide each aircraft with the other aircraft's position within the airspace and other appropriate information, such as altitude, vehicle type, speed, and heading. The transmissions occur at unique time slots to avoid interference. It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to aircraft or aircraft-related systems, but may also include automobiles, boats, spacecraft, and other navigable vehicles. The data messages can be passed directly between the aircraft or via a conventional communication satellite 17.
Differences between the various embodiments discussed herein relate mainly to different system parameters required by the physical environment in which the embodiment will be used and the need for different accuracies and scanning speeds for the described uses. The basic concepts of grid segment mapping, shown in Figures 4, 5, 7, and 8, are the same for all embodiments.
Shown in Figure 2 is a vehicle location and collision avoidance system 18 according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The system 18 includes a global positioning system (GPS) receiver 20 that receives signals from three or more GPS satellites (not shown), each signal including a precise timing value, from which the GPS receiver calculates the latitude, longitude, and altitude of the vehicle . The GPS receiver 20 passes the vehicle position information and the timing signal to a microcomputer 22. As discussed in more detail below, the microcomputer calculates a unique time slot for the vehicle based on the relative position of the vehicle with respect to a reference waypoint. The microcomputer 22 passes the position information received from the GPS receiver 20 to a beacon transmitter 24 which transmits the position information to other vehicles or to fixed traffic controller stations during the unique time slot calculated by the microcomputer. Where direct communication is possible, traffic control stations equipped with this system can intercept the transmitted data messages and display the positions of the transmitting aircraft, enabling vehicle traffic control. Where direct reception of data messages is not possible, such as on or above remote stretches of ocean, the microcomputer 22 sends the position information to a communications satellite transmitter 26 for transmission to traffic control stations via communications satellites. Discrete channels can be assigned to each separate traffic control area to eliminate transmissions from vehicles outside the traffic control area.
The system 18 includes a beacon receiver 28 that receives position data messages from the fixed ground stations and from other vehicles. These data messages are supplied to the microcomputer 22 which mathematically determines the bearing and distance of all aircraft and/or ground stations from which the data messages are received. The microcomputer 18 provides output signals to a display system 30, which displays the positions of the aircraft and/or ground stations within some predetermined range. If the target aircraft is within a predetermined minimum distance, then the microcomputer triggers an audible warning system 32, causing the warning system to emit an audible warning signal notifying the vehicle pilot or driver of the nearby aircraft. In addition, the microcomputer causes a warning display system 34 to display the bearing, range, and altitude of the target vehicle.
THE FIRST EMBODIMENT Shown in Figure 3 is a vehicle location method 36 according to a first embodiment of the present invention. In step 38 the area in which the vehicle can possibly operate is charted into numerous grid segments 39. In the first embodiment the operating area is the entire surface of the earth, a portion of which is shown in Figure 4.
Grid segment dimensions are set at one degree per side for this embodiment, although a different dimension may be used. This produces a total of 129600 grid segments 39, starting at the zero meridian of longitude and running eastward and westward to the 180th meridian, and starting at the equator and running northward and southward from the equator to the poles, as illustrated in Figure 4. The linear distances associated with degrees of latitude remain constant over the global surface but linear distances associated with degrees of longitude decrease for those grid segments charted north and south of the equator. However, the dimensions of each grid segment are constant in degrees, minutes, and seconds of latitude and longitude. Each grid segment dimension in this embodiment can be stated as 1 degree, or 60 minutes, or 3600 seconds of latitude and longitude respectively. Each grid segment is assigned a reference waypoint 40 in latitude and longitude representing the northernmost and westernmost point of the grid segment. A vehicle's position within the grid segment in which it is navigating, relative to the reference waypoint, uniquely assigns the vehicle a time slot in which to transmit.
Time slot dimensions depend on the transmission capability of the data link system used to transmit and receive data packets. For example, the beacon transmitter 24 and the beacon receiver 28 of the present invention use an airborne component of the Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System/Mode Select (ATCRBS/Mode S), which has a 1 Megabit/sec capacity for transmitting, and its data packet is 112 bits long, plus an 8 usec preamble. This requires a time slot approximately 123 usec long. The total number of time slots depends on the scan time, or the time interval that elapses between an individual aircraft's data packet transmissions. For this embodiment 7 seconds has been selected, although a different scan rate may be chosen. Thus, this embodiment has 1,000,000/123 time slots per second times 7 seconds, or 56,910 time slots.
In step 41 of the method shown in Figure 3, these time slots are then mapped onto each grid segment 39. The x-axis mapping function is called a synthetic longitude function and the y-axis mapping function is called a synthetic latitude function in this invention. In the interest of symmetry, the time slot mapping onto each grid segment has been selected to be 238 rows by 238 columns per grid segment as shown in Figure 5. It should be noted that Figure 5 shows 10 rows and 10 columns, with each row representing 23.8 actual rows and each column representing 23.8 actual columns. Each grid segment is mapped starting at the reference waypoint and proceeding from left to right by rows. This produces an actual count of 56,644 time slots, each 123.57 usec long. This mapping protocol ensures that the maximum position change required to shift time slots is 1,531.76 feet, or approximately 0.25 nautical miles along either the latitude or the longitude axis. The corresponding latitude or longitude increment required to shift time slots is 15.12 seconds of latitude or longitude (3600 seconds per degree ÷ 238 rows or columns). Different scan rates would require different position changes to shift time slots. A discussion of the mathematical relationships involved in mapping according to synthetic longitude and latitude functions may be helpful at this point. Consider the area represented by a grid segment, mapped by relative longitude and latitude with respect to a reference waypoint within the grid segment. Consider the same area represented by the same grid segment, mapped by a synthetic longitude and latitude function relative to the same reference waypoint. These synthetic longitude and latitude functions are a scale transformation of the relative longitude and latitude mapping described above, each starting from a common origin.
If x, y respectively represent a vehicle's relative longitude and latitude within a grid segment, with respect to the reference waypoint of that grid segment, and u, v represent the same relative longitude and latitude, transformed by a scale factor, B, to produce the synthetic longitude and latitude functions, the transforming equations can be written as:
u = Bx (1) and, v = By (2)
As can be seen from equations (1) and (2), the synthetic longitude and latitude mapping functions are correlated to the relative longitude and latitude mapping of a grid segment by the scale factor, B, (238/3600 for the preferred embodiment) in such a manner that a vehicle's relative position uniquely determines a synthetic longitude value and a synthetic latitude value. The reciprocal of the scale factor (3600/238 or 15.12) determines the increment of position change in relative longitude and latitude required to shift one unit on the synthetic longitude or latitude scale.
An additional equation defines the relationship of the synthetic longitude and latitude functions to the real time spectrum as follows: _ System Scan Time Period
Time Required to Transmit a Data Message
Equation (3) sets the product of the maximum values of the synthetic longitude and latitude functions u, v, to the maximum number of time slots, of the required slot length, that can be accommodated within one system scan time period. A system scan time period is defined as the time period between repetitive cycles through the sequentially mapped time slots.
The time required to transmit a data message is determined by the message length, in bits, and the bit rate transmission capability of the data link system used to transmit the data message. The system scan time period, divided by the length of time required to transmit a single aircraft data message, determines the maximum number of data messages that can be transmitted during one scan time period. This number establishes the maximum number of time slots that can be mapped by the synthetic longitude and latitude functions. If symmetry of the synthetic longitude and latitude functions is desired, then the square root of this number yields the maximum number of units of such synthetic longitude and latitude. This correlation permits the sequential mapping of time slots onto the area represented by the grid segment such that the start of each time slot corresponds to an integral set of synthetic longitude and latitude coordinates and, through the scale factor, also corresponds to a set of relative longitude and latitude coordinates. This correspondence permits the system described in the first embodiment to uniquely assign a time slot to a vehicle occupying the position that corresponds to those coordinates, during which it transmits a data message.
Continuing with the vehicle location method shown in Figure 3, the longitude and latitude of the vehicle are received from the GPS in step 42. In step 44, the appropriate reference waypoint for a grid segment is selected automatically by the microcomputer 22 using the actual position data obtained from the GPS receiver 20. Preferably, westerly longitude and northerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded up to the next whole degree to find the reference waypoint longitude or latitude value. Easterly longitude and southerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded down to the next whole degree to obtain the reference waypoint longitude or latitude value.
In step 46, the relative position of the vehicle within a grid segment is found by subtracting the actual latitude and longitude of the vehicle's position from that of the reference waypoint of that grid segment, and using the absolute value of the result. Thus, the range of relative latitude and longitude values is 0 to 3600 seconds and is identical for all grid segments. This permits identical time mapping of the synthetic functions on each grid segment, regardless of the grid segments location on the global surface.
A synthetic altitude function, which is a scale transformation of actual altitude, is defined by equation (4) in a manner similar to the synthetic longitude and latitude functions:
z = Cw. (4)
The scale factor, C, transforms actual altitude, w, into the synthetic altitude function, z. For embodiment two, C equals 60/40000. Here, also, the reciprocal of the scale factor determines the increment of altitude change required to change one unit on the synthetic altitude scale. The scale factor, B, used to define the synthetic longitude and latitude functions u, v, for the second embodiment is 80/3600. For three dimensional time mapping, the product of the maximum value of the three functions, u, v, and z is set equal to one system scan time period, divided by the length of time required to transmit one aircraft data message.
Figure imgf000012_0001
Equation (5) sets the product of the maximum values of the three synthetic functions u,v,z, equal to the maximum number of time slots that can be accommodated in one system scan time period. Embodiment two employs a scan time period and data link system that provides 400,000 time slots. Dividing this number of time slots by 60 and taking the square root of the quotient produces a 60 unit synthetic altitude function, representing 60 altitude levels up to and including 40,000 feet and above as the final upper level, and symmetrical synthetic longitude and latitude functions of 80 units each, mapping each of these altitude levels. This correlation permits the sequential mapping of the time slots onto the volume over the grid segment such that the start of each time slot corresponds to an integral set of synthetic longitude, latitude, and altitude coordinates and, through the scale factors, also corresponds to a set of relative longitude, latitude, and altitude coordinates. This correspondence permits the system described in embodiment two to uniquely assign a time slot to an aircraft occupying the position that corresponds to those coordinates, during which it transmits a data message. The latitude synthetic function (y coordinate axis) has 238 rows, each row being 29411.76 usec long. This function preferably is represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 238 addresses, of which the first is set to zero and each successive address contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 29411.76. The longitude synthetic function (x coordinate axis) has 238 columns along a row each 123.57 usec wide. This function is represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 238 addresses, of which the first is set to 123.57 and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 123.57. Each of these tables is entered into at an address calculated by dividing the vehicle's relative latitude in seconds within a grid segment by the increment of latitude required to shift rows, i.e., 15.12 (3600/238), for the latitude table, and its relative longitude in seconds, within a grid segment, by the increment of longitude required to shift columns, or 15.12, for the longitude table. The result in each case, discarding any remainder which selects the time slot at its beginning, will be an integral number ranging from 1 to 238.
In step 48, the microcomputer 22 computes a time slot for the vehicle. The sum of the contents of the selected table addresses of the latitude synthetic function and the longitude synthetic function, discarding any fractional component, represents a mapped time slot within the grid segment and can be used to set a timing counter in microcomputer 22. The countdown of the counter is started simultaneously for all vehicles by the microcomputer 22 using the precise clock synchronizing signal received from the GPS receiver 20. At the expiration of each vehicle's countdown, the microcomputer 22 causes the vehicle, using the Mode S Beacon Transmitter 24, to transmit a data message, previously described, within this uniquely defined time slot (step 50). This occurs repetitively at the scan rate, or once each 7 seconds, for all vehicles. Where scan times are not integrally divisible into 24 hours, such as the 7 second scan for this embodiment, the microcomputer 22 can be programmed to reset the scans for all aircraft to begin at 0000 Greenwich Mean Time, derived from GPS time, by leaping over the fractional scan period. As each vehicle's position changes within the grid segment, the time slot in which it transmits a data message also changes. As long as vehicles are separated from each other by a horizontal distance greater than .25 nautical mile along the latitude or longitude axis, there will be no overlap in aircraft transmissions.
For purposes of comparison, if a 1 second scan rate is used in the first embodiment, this allows 8,100 time slots, each 123.45 usec long. The time slot mapping onto each grid segment produces 90 rows by 90 columns per grid segment. Maximum change of position to shift time slots is 4,050.66 feet, or 2/3 nautical mile, along either the latitude or longitude axis. The corresponding increment of latitude and longitude required to shift time slots is 40 seconds of latitude and longitude respectively. The shorter scan rate allows a much more frequent position update, but accomplishes this at the expense of system resolution, or increment of position change required to shift time slots.
On occasion, two vehicles in nearby grid segments or at different altitudes in the same grid segment may occupy the same time slot. However, since time slot assignment changes dynamically based on each vehicle's position relative to its respective reference waypoint, the probability that such conflict will exist for more than one scan is small, even with high densities of vehicles. Computer tracking logic, currently used in ground air traffic control locations, uses position, altitude, speed, and heading data to project a vehicle's track as a function of time, in order to predict position conflicts and potential collisions. This logic can also be used to predict simultaneous vehicle transmissions within the same time slot, since each time slot assignment is a function of a vehicle's position. Each conflicting vehicle's time slot assignment can then be shifted slightly by its tracking logic to prevent this occurrence. Vehicles in grid segments farther away will be outside communication range.
The grid segment time mapping protocol, together with a vehicle's relative position within a grid segment, assigns the time slot during which an aircraft transmits a data message containing position data in latitude and longitude, altitude data (if any), and a vehicle identification code. Other data such as heading and speed may also be transmitted. While the vehicle's relative position with respect to the reference waypoint is used to assign a transmission time slot to the vehicle, this is not the position data that is transmitted to other vehicles and to fixed locations. Actual latitude and longitude obtained from the GPS is transmitted and may then be referred to the waypoints or to any other reference system for display or navigational purposes.
As discussed above, the system 18 shown in Figure 2 can provide each vehicle with information regarding nearby vehicles in order to avoid collisions. Shown in Figure 6 is a method 52 used by the system 18 to avoid collisions between vehicles. In step 54 the beacon receiver 28 (Figure 2) of the parent aircraft 10 (Figure 1) receives a data message from a target aircraft 12 (Figure 1). As discussed above, the data message includes the latitude and longitude of the target aircraft and may also include other information such as altitude, bearing, speed, and an aircraft ID. In step 56 the microcomputer 22 of the parent aircraft computes the distance between the parent and target aircraft using the latitude, longitude, and altitude (if any) of the respective aircraft. In step 58 the microcomputer 22 determines whether the target aircraft is within a predetermined threshold distance from the parent aircraft. If so, then in step 60 the microcomputer 22 causes the audible warning system 32 and the warning display system 34 to warn the vehicle pilot or driver of the intruding target aircraft. As discussed above, the warning display system displays the bearing, range, and altitude of the intruding target aircraft. Regardless of whether the target aircraft is within the threshold distance, the microcomputer causes the display system 30 to display the position of the target aircraft in step 62. In an alternate embodiment, the microcomputer 22 can determine whether to issue a warning to the pilot by calculating whether the target aircraft is within a predetermined threshold time from colliding with the parent aircraft. Such a potential collision time can be calculated based on the bearing and speed of the target aircraft in addition to the distance of the target aircraft from the parent aircraft.
The system described above can be used by properly equipped aircraft, ships, trains and other vehicles in an identical manner. Different beacon frequencies will be required to prevent commingling with the vehicle system transmissions, and discrete Communication Satellite channels will be required to transmit position data to the appropriate display locations. Trucks, busses, and automobiles that are properly equipped can also use the system for transmitting location data to a remote display point via a discrete Communication Satellite Channel, however, the beacon transmission would not be required.
THE SECOND EMBODIMENT
In a second embodiment, the vehicle location and collision avoidance system 18 assigns a time slot for each aircraft based on the aircraft's altitude in addition to its latitude and longitude. The hardware used for the second embodiment is the same as that used for the first embodiment (Figure 2). The GPS receiver 20 calculates the aircraft's altitude, longitude, and latitude from the GPS signals received from the GPS satellites and the microcomputer 22 assigns a time slot for the aircraft based on the aircraft's relative position within a three-dimensional grid segment. Grid segment charting and reference waypoint assignment for this embodiment is identical to that of the first embodiment. A third axis (z coordinate axis) representing altitude can be added to the invention if the data link transmission rate is improved or if longer scan time periods are used. In this embodiment the airborne beacon transmission capability is increased to 4 Mbit/Sec, comparable to the ground transmitter component of the Mode S beacon system, and the scan time is increased to 12 seconds. Transmitting a 112 bit data packet plus a 2 usec preamble at this higher bit rate requires a time slot length of approximately 30 usec. Dividing one scan time interval by 30 usec produces 400,000 time slots. These time slots are mapped to the three coordinates in a manner that ensures that the horizontal position change required to shift time slots is minimized, and the vertical position change required to shift time slots is less than the altitude separation used for air traffic control. Dividing this total number of time slots by 60 and allocating the 60 slices to the volume over the grid segment, produces 60 altitude bands each containing 6,666 time slots. Each of these bands represents a 666.67 foot altitude increment, and, in this embodiment, the altitude synthetic function is mapped to 40,000 feet. The latitude and longitude coordinates are chosen as 80 by 80 for symmetry. The resulting time mapping of coordinates is then 80 by 80 by 60 which produces 384,000 time slots, each 31.25 usec long. The position change required to shift time slots is 4,557 feet or approximately .75 nautical mile along either the latitude or longitude axis, or 666.67 feet of altitude change along the altitude axis. Corresponding changes of latitude and longitude to shift time slots is 45 seconds of latitude or longitude. In this embodiment, time slot mapping is accomplished starting at the reference waypoint at the surface, mapping from left to right by rows, and after each altitude band is mapped, moving up 666.67 feet to the next altitude band and repeating the same sequence until the volume above the grid segment is mapped up to 40,000 feet. All of the few aircraft able to fly above 40,000 feet will be assigned 40,000 feet of altitude when flying above that level for purposes of time slot assignment.
The appropriate reference waypoint for a grid segment is selected automatically by the microcomputer 22 using the aircraft's actual position data obtained from the GPS Receiver 20. As in the first embodiment, westerly longitude and northerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded up to the next whole degree to find the reference waypoint longitude or latitude value. Easterly longitude and southerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded down to the next whole degree to obtain the reference waypoint longitude or latitude value.
Relative position within a grid segment is found by subtracting the actual latitude and longitude of the aircraft's position from that of the reference waypoint of that grid segment, and using the absolute value of the result. Thus, the range of relative latitude and longitude values is 0 to 3600 seconds and is identical for all grid segments. This permits identical time mapping of the synthetic functions on each grid segment, regardless of the grid segments location on the global surface. The latitude synthetic function (y coordinate axis) has 80 rows each
2500 usec long. This function can be represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 80 addresses, of which the first is set to zero and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 2500. The longitude synthetic function (x coordinate axis) has 80 columns along a row each 31.25 usec wide. This function can be represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 80 addresses, of which the first is set to 31.25 and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 31.25. Each of these tables is entered into at an address calculated by dividing the aircraft's relative latitude in seconds, within a grid segment, by the increment of latitude required to shift rows, or 45, for the latitude table, and its relative longitude in seconds, within a grid segment, by the increment of longitude required to shift columns, or 45, for the longitude table. The result in each case, discarding any remainder which selects the time slot at its beginning, will be an integral number ranging from 1 to 80. The altitude synthetic function (z coordinate axis) has 60 levels, each encompassing 200,000 usec of the scan time period. This function can be represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 60 addresses, of which the first is set to zero and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 200,000. This table is entered into at an address calculated by dividing the aircraft's altitude, provided by the GPS, by 666.67, the altitude increment of change required to shift time slots. The result, discarding any remainder which selects the altitude level at its beginning, will be an integral number ranging from 1 to 60. The sum of the contents of the selected table addresses of the latitude synthetic function, the longitude synthetic function, and the altitude synthetic function, discarding any fractional component, represents a mapped time slot within the grid segment volume and can be used to set a timing counter in the microcomputer 22. The countdown of the counter is started simultaneously for all aircraft within the airspace by the microcomputer 22 using the precise clock synchronizing signal received from the GPS receiver 20. At the expiration of each aircraft's countdown, the microcomputer 22 causes the aircraft, using the beacon transmitter 24, to transmit a data message, previously described, within this uniquely defined time slot. This occurs repetitively at the scan rate or, once each 12 seconds for all aircraft. As each aircraft's position changes within the grid segment volume, the time slot in which it transmits a data message also changes. As long as aircraft are separated from each other by a distance greater than .75 nautical mile along the latitude or longitude axis, or by an altitude greater than 666.67 feet, there will be no overlap in aircraft transmissions.
THE THIRD EMBODIMENT A smaller scale charting of grid segments onto an airport area can be used to show the ground location of aircraft on the airport surface and such information can be provided to other aircraft for display, and to the control tower for display and control of aircraft ground movements. A separate beacon transmitter and receiver frequency will be required, to which all aircraft would be directed to switch, upon landing or upon pushback from the terminal, to prevent interference with the airborne system previously described. Shown in Figure 6 is an airport area 64 six minutes of latitude by six minutes of longitude, the boundaries of which are coincident with integral minutes of latitude and longitude. Of course, different dimensions could be used to map different areas. This area is centered on an airport 66, as precisely as possible, and divided into grid segments 67 of 20 seconds of latitude by 20 seconds of longitude. This will produce 324 small scale grid segments as shown in Figure 7. Small scale charting together with a very short scan rate is required due to the close proximity of aircraft on an airport. A 1 -second scan time is selected for this embodiment.
The data being transmitted in this embodiment is an aircraft identifier and position coordinates. A reasonable time slot length of 123 usec. is selected. Using the bandwidth of the airborne beacon transmitter 24 (Figure 2), the number of time slots possible for a one second scan rate is 1,000,000/123 or 8,130. Here also, for purposes of symmetry, the time slot mapping onto each grid segment has been selected to be 90 rows by 90 columns per grid segment. This produces an actual count of 8,100 grid slots, each 123.45 usec long. This mapping protocol ensures that the maximum position change required to shift time slots is 22.5 feet along either the latitude or the longitude axis. The corresponding latitude or longitude increment required to change time slots is 222.22 milliseconds of latitude or longitude. Although different computer program parameters are required, the system functions identically to the airborne system described in the first embodiment and uses the same equipment shown in Figure 2.
The appropriate reference waypoint for a grid segment is selected automatically by the microcomputer 22 using the aircraft's actual position data obtained from the GPS receiver 20. A protocol for accomplishing this is as follows: westerly longitude and northerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded up to the next whole multiple of 20 seconds to obtain the reference waypoint latitude or longitude value. Easterly longitude and southerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded down to the next whole multiple of 20 seconds to obtain the reference waypoint latitude or longitude value. Relative position within a grid segment is found by subtracting the actual latitude and longitude of the aircraft's position from that of the reference waypoint of that grid segment, and using the absolute value of the result. Thus, the range of relative latitude and longitude values is 0 to 20 seconds and is identical for all grid segments. This permits identical time mapping of the synthetic functions on each grid segment, regardless of the grid segments location in the area charted around the airport.
The latitude synthetic function (y coordinate axis) has 90 rows each 11,111.11 usec long. This function can be represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 90 addresses, of which the first is set to zero and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 11,111.11. The longitude synthetic function (x coordinate axis) has 90 columns along a row each 123.45 usec wide. This function can be represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 90 addresses, of which the first is set to 123.45 and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 123.45. Each of these tables is entered into at an address calculated by dividing the aircraft's relative latitude in milliseconds, within a grid segment, by 222.22, for the latitude table, and its relative longitude in milliseconds, within a grid segment, by 222.22, for the longitude table. The result in each case, discarding any remainder which selects the time slot at its beginning, will be an integral number ranging from 1 to 90.
The sum of the contents of the selected table addresses of the latitude synthetic function and the longitude synthetic function, discarding any fractional component, represents a mapped time slot within the grid segment and can be used to set a timing counter in the microcomputer 22. The countdown of the timing counter is started simultaneously for all aircraft on the airport by the microcomputer 22 using the precise clock synchronizing signal received by the GPS receiver 20. At the expiration of each aircraft's countdown, the microcomputer 22 causes the aircraft, using its beacon transmitter 24, to transmit its aircraft ID and position coordinates, within its uniquely defined time slot. This occurs repetitively at the scan rate or, once each second for all aircraft on the airport surface. As each aircraft's position changes within the grid segment, the time slot in which it transmits data also changes.
Each receiving aircraft and the air traffic control tower of the airport receive the data messages by way of its respective beacon receiver 24. These data messages are supplied to the microcomputer 22 which mathematically determines the bearing and distance of all aircraft from which data messages are received, the microcomputer 22 causes the display system 30, to display the position of all aircraft from which messages are received, permitting pilots to know the position of all moving aircraft on the airport and permitting the control tower to control the movement of aircraft on the airport.
THE FOURTH EMBODIMENT
A smaller scale charting of grid segments onto an area, such as a city or a county, or other political subdivision, can be used to show the location of police and emergency vehicles and such information can be provided to a fixed control point for display and control of vehicle movements. Shown in Figure 8 is a metropolitan area 68 thirty minutes of latitude by 30 minutes of longitude, the boundaries of which are coincident with integral minutes of latitude and longitude. However, different dimensions could be used. This area is centered on the city or county, as precisely as possible, and divided into grid segments of 1 minute of latitude by 1 minute of longitude, thereby producing 900 small scale grid segments 70. Small scale charting is necessary to increase position accuracy.
As Vehicle ID and position coordinates are required to be transmitted in this embodiment, a time slot length of 123 usec is selected. Assuming a 1 Mbit/Sec capacity of the Communication Satellite channel, the number of time slots possible for a 90 second scan time is 90,000,000/123 or 731707. Although a 90 second scan time is selected for this embodiment, a shorter scan time could be used for a more rapid position update. Here also, for purposes of symmetry, the time slot mapping onto each grid segment has been selected to be 855 rows by 855 columns per grid segment. This produces an actual count of 731025 grid slots, each 123.11 usec. long. This mapping protocol ensures that the maximum position change required to shift time slots is 7.1 feet along either the latitude or the longitude axis. The corresponding latitude or longitude increment required to change time slots is 70.17 milliseconds of latitude or longitude. Although different computer program parameters are required, the system functions identically to the airborne system described in the first embodiment and uses the same equipment, shown in Figure 2. However, preferably the ground-based system of the fourth embodiment is isolated from the airborne system of the first embodiment by use of a separate communication satellite transmitter channel or, by use of a broadband ground communication system. Transmission via the beacon transmitter 24 is not required for this embodiment.
The appropriate reference waypoint for a grid segment is selected automatically by the microcomputer 22 using the vehicle's actual position data obtained from the GPS receiver 20. A protocol for accomplishing this is as follows: westerly longitude and northerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded up to the next whole minute to obtain the reference waypoint latitude or longitude value. Easterly longitude and southerly latitude values contained in position coordinates are rounded down to the next whole minute to obtain the reference waypoint latitude or longitude value. Relative position within a grid segment is found by subtracting the actual latitude and longitude of the vehicles position from that of the reference waypoint of that grid segment, and using the absolute value of the result. Thus, the range of relative latitude and longitude values is 0 to 60,000 milliseconds and is identical for all grid segments. This permits identical time mapping of the synthetic functions on each grid segment, regardless of the grid segments location in the area.
The latitude synthetic function (y coordinate axis) has 855 rows each 105263.15 usec long. This function can be represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 855 addresses, of which the first is set to zero and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 105,263.15. The longitude synthetic function (x coordinate axis) has 855 columns along a row each 123.11 usec wide. This function can be represented in a microcomputer program as a table consisting of 855 addresses, of which the first is set to 123.11 and each successive one contains the sum of the contents of the previous address plus 123.11. Each of these tables is entered into at an address calculated by dividing the vehicles relative latitude in milliseconds, within a grid segment, by 70.17, for the latitude table, and its relative longitude in milliseconds, within a grid segment, by 70.17, for the longitude table. The result in each case, discarding any remainder which selects the time slot at its beginning, will be an integral number ranging from 1 to 855.
The sum of the contents of the selected table addresses of the latitude synthetic function and the longitude synthetic function, discarding any fractional component, represents a mapped time slot within the grid segment and can be used to set a timing counter in the microcomputer 22. The countdown of the timing counter is started simultaneously for all vehicles within the area by the microcomputer 22 using the precise clock synchronizing signal received from the Global Positioning System 14 by GPS receiver 20. At the expiration of each vehicle's countdown, the microcomputer 22 causes the vehicle, using the communication satellite transmitter 26, to transmit its vehicle ID and position coordinates within its uniquely defined time slot. This occurs repetitively at the scan rate, or once each 90 seconds, for all vehicles within the area. As each vehicle's position changes within the grid segment, the time slot in which it transmits data also changes.
A fixed control station (not shown) receives the data messages by way of a communication satellite receiver similar to the beacon receiver 28 shown in Figure 2. The control station uses the data contained in the data messages to display the position of all vehicles from which messages are received, permitting the control station to control the movement of vehicles in the area.
THE FIFTH EMBODIMENT
For some applications, such as an aircraft approaching an airport runway, the first through fourth embodiments may not be sufficiently accurate. Such suboptimum accuracy can be caused be many factors, such as atmospheric distortion and military-imposed periodic inaccuracies with the GPS system. The military imposes such inaccuracies to prevent hostile users from using the GPS system to guide missiles launched against U.S. targets. The military does not oppose persons skilled in the art to develop methods to overcome the military-imposed inaccuracies on a local, line-of- sight basis, so that the GPS can be used by commercial aircraft without affecting the military's ability to stop such hostile use. The fifth embodiment discussed herein is such a method that overcomes military-imposed and other inaccuracies and provides a higher degree of accuracy than does standard GPS.
The fifth embodiment is directed to a method and system for providing highly accurate guidance to a vehicle, such as an aircraft approaching an airport runway. In addition, the fifth embodiment calculates a differential GPS correction factor that is used to adjust the vehicle location calculated using the GPS system in the first through fourth embodiments.
The fifth embodiment system includes three ground stations: station A 72, station B 74, and station C 76, located at precisely surveyed positions within an area surrounding an airport 78 as shown in Figure 9. These stations may be separated by a few miles, up to tens of miles, but should be located so as to provide a good Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP) to an aircraft 80 on approach to any runway on the airport. Three is the minimum number of stations that will provide three dimensional position coordinates to a receiving aircraft, however only one station is required for differential corrections of ranges. Like the other embodiments, the fifth embodiment uses the GPS system which includes a set of 24 navigational satellites 82 spaced above the surface of the earth. The differential correction method will be described first, followed by the method of providing terminal guidance to an aircraft on approach to an airport. Each ground station 72-76 is substantially similar to the vehicle location and collision avoidance system of Figure 2, as shown in Figure 10. As such, the items shown in Figure 10 are discussed herein only to the extent that they differ from the system of Figure 2.
Each of the ground stations has three multi-channel GPS Receivers 20A-C, each of which is capable of tracking and measuring the pseudo-range to multiple satellites simultaneously. As is known in the art, the pseudo-range refers to the travel time of a GPS signal from a satellite to the ground station multiplied by the speed of light. The travel time is computed by recording the time that the signal arrives at the ground station and subtracting from that recorded time the time at which the signal leaves the satellite, which is included in each GPS signal. The calculated range is referred to as pseudo-range because of errors in the calculated range caused by atmospheric disturbances in the GPS signal.
A microcomputer 22 at each ground station 72-76 allocates visible GPS satellites to three GPS receivers 20 in each ground station. Each GPS receiver is assigned GPS satellites until all visible GPS satellites are assigned, with a maximum of four satellites per GPS receiver. The GPS satellites assigned to each GPS receiver are selected to obtain a good Geometric Dilution Of Precision (GDOP). As is known in the art, the GDOP is a mathematical calculation of the angular dispersion between the GPS satellites selected.
The three GPS receivers 20A-C make pseudo-range measurements (actually travel time measurements and pseudo-range calculations) to each of their assigned satellites simultaneously at a predetermined time known as the GPS epoch, which preferably occurs every six seconds. Each GPS receiver calculates uncorrected position coordinates for the ground station from the calculated pseudo-ranges. Preferably, the GPS receivers used the Earth Centered, Earth Fixed (ECEF) coordinate system to express the position coordinates. The GPS receivers send the position coordinates to the microcomputer 22, which causes the beacon transmitter 24 to transmit the coordinates in a data message, described below, during it's assigned time slot.
Using known astronomical equations, the location of each GPS satellite at each GPS epoch is calculated by the GPS receiver using parameters contained in the navigational data message transmitted by the GPS satellite, the location being known as an ephemeris. Using the known satellite ephemeris (Xj,Yj,Zj) and the uncorrected ground station location (Xj,Yi,Zj), a pseudo-range (Rjj(+)) between each GPS satellite (j) and each ground station (i) can be calculated using the following equation 1 :
Ry (0 0)
Figure imgf000023_0001
The uncorrected position coordinates contained in the data message of each ground station (i) are derived by each GPS Receiver 20A-C as the simultaneous solution to a system of equations, with one equation according to equation 1 for each GPS satellite assigned to the GPS receiver. Since the solution is common to all the equations, it therefore is a solution to each single equation.
The data message sent by the beacon transmitter 24 changes with each successive time slot for each ground station 72-76. A first data message includes an identification address of the ground station, the uncorrected position coordinates of the ground station calculated by the first GPS receiver 20A, Pseudo-Random Noise (PRN) code numbers of the four satellites assigned to the first GPS receiver 20, and the epoch time at which the pseudo-range measurements to each satellite were made. The microcomputer 22 then causes the beacon transmitter 24 to transmit a second data message during the next assigned time slot for the ground station. The second data message includes the ground station's identification address, the uncorrected position coordinates of the ground station calculated by the second GPS Receiver 20, the PRN code numbers of the four satellites assigned to the second GPS Receiver 20, and the epoch time at which the pseudo-range measurements to each satellite were made. The microcomputer 22 then causes the beacon transmitter 24 to transmit a third data message during the next assigned time slot for the ground station. The third data message includes the ground station's address, the uncorrected position coordinates of the ground station calculated by the third GPS Receiver 20, the PRN code numbers of the satellites used by the third GPS Receiver 20, and the epoch time at which the pseudo-range measurements to each satellite were made. The sequence of data messages requires three time slots for each ground station 72-76. Preferably, the sequence repeats using the same data that was transmitted in the previous sequence. Thus, each receiving aircraft has two opportunities to receive position data from each ground station based on all satellites, taken four at a time. The two sequences require 6 time slots, or six seconds, at which time a new GPS epoch occurs. At each GPS epoch, new simultaneous pseudo-range and uncorrected position coordinate calculations are made as described above, and the sequences are repeated using the new uncorrected position coordinates.
The events described above occur at each ground station 72-76 for each GPS epoch. Thus, the uncorrected position coordinates for each ground station are available to each receiving aircraft based on every satellite in view. Any one of the ground stations provides all of the data needed to calculate pseudo-range corrections as explained below. All three are included in the system to extend the range at which GPS correction factors are available.
An aircraft 80 receives the data messages from each ground station 72- 76 and uses the information in the data message to calculate the GPS correction factor that is used to adjust the GPS-derived aircraft location discussed above with respect to the first through fourth embodiments. The aircraft microcomputer 22 begins the GPS correction factor calculation by recalculating the pseudo-range for each visible GPS satellite using the uncorrected position coordinates for each ground station and the ephemeris of each satellite plugged in to equation 1. To ensure that the correct ephemeris is available, the aircraft microcomputer 22 and the microcomputer 22 in each ground station 72-76 maintain a running history table of epoch time and associated ephemeris for each GPS satellite, for the current epoch and three preceding epochs. As each new epoch occurs, the epoch and it's associated ephemeris for each GPS satellite, obtained from the GPS navigation data message, are placed at the top of the table and each preceding epoch and it's associated ephemeris for each GPS satellite are moved down in the table. The oldest epoch and it's associated ephemerides are eliminated.
A similar analysis can be made to determine an actual range between each ground station 72-76 and the GPS satellites 82 assigned to the ground station using precisely surveyed and accurately known position coordinates of each ground station 72-76. Rather than broadcasting the position coordinates of the ground stations to each aircraft 80, the position coordinates are aggregated into a table of coordinates and stored in a non-volatile memory, such as an EPROM, of every microcomputer 22 employing this method. The microcomputer 22 of the aircraft 80 uses the surveyed position coordinates of each ground station (si) and the ephemerides of the satellites (j) assigned to the ground station to compute the actual ranges (Rsji) using the following equation 2:
Figure imgf000025_0001
Equation 2 is used to compute the actual range of each satellite assigned to each ground station.
The difference between the calculated pseudo-range and the calculated actual range from the ground station to each of the satellites is the GPS correction factor applicable to the pseudo-range for any aircraft in the vicinity of the ground stations 72-76. The GPS correction factor can be determined by the following equation
3: GPS correction factor = R .. (/) - R.. (t) (3) sy y
In the computations above, for each ground station i, j = 1 to n, where n equals the number of visible satellites.
The beacon receiver 28 (Figure 2) of each receiving aircraft 80 receives the data messages from each ground station 72-76, transmitted during the ground station's assigned time slot by the ground station's beacon transmitter 24. When data messages for all satellites in view have been received and passed to the aircraft's microcomputer 22, the GPS correction factor for each visible satellite is calculated as described above. Thus, all vehicles receiving the data messages of any one of the ground stations have all the data needed to make differential corrections to pseudo- ranges calculated for the vehicles and each satellite in view. Each vehicle need only to select the GPS correction factors applicable to the satellites being used by it's GPS Receiver 20, which are identified by the PRN code numbers broadcast in each ground station data message.
Next is a description of how the method of the fifth embodiment provides guidance to an aircraft 80 making an approach to an airport 78, when the aircraft is within the transmission range of all three ground stations 72-76. Each aircraft on approach receives the transmitted data messages from each ground station 72-76 via the aircraft's beacon receiver 28. The beacon receiver passes the data messages to the aircraft's microcomputer 22, which identifies each of the ground stations by its identification address in the data messages. The microcomputer uses the identification address to select precisely surveyed coordinates of the identified ground station from its non-volatile memory. The microcomputer marks and stores the time of reception of each data message using GPS time supplied by the aircraft's GPS receiver 20.
The receiving aircraft's microcomputer 22 computes the time of transmission of the data messages from each of the ground stations by determining the time slot during which the transmission occurred. The microcomputer determines the ground station's time slot by identifying the grid segment and the relative position in the grid segment in which the stored surveyed coordinates of the ground station are located. Such a determination is identical to that made by each ground station in determining the correct time slot in which to transmit its data messages. The time slot determination are accomplished as described above in the first through fourth embodiments. The receiving aircraft's microcomputer 22 computes the transit time between the receiving aircraft and each transmitting ground station 72-76 by subtracting the computed time of data transmission from the stored time of data reception, and scales the result by the speed of light. This produces a range from the aircraft 80 to each of the three ground stations. Each range is expressed in equation form in terms of the three known position coordinates of the ground station to which the range applies and the three unknown position coordinates of the receiving aircraft. This produces three range equations containing three unknowns. The aircraft microcomputer 22 solves the three equations simultaneously to determine the receiving aircraft's position in three dimensional space. The position coordinates are used to display and update the aircraft's position during the approach. New solutions for the aircraft's position updates occur repetitively at the system scan rate.
The approach method described herein provides superior accuracy to aircraft on approaches than does the GPS. Since the position coordinates of the three ground stations are very accurately known, the position coordinates of the receiving aircraft derived by this method are not affected by inaccurate satellite vehicle ephemerides, nor by the truncation of ephemeris data employed while accuracy degradation, called selective availability, is being imposed by the military. The effect of clock dithering, also imposed by the military for the same purpose, is eliminated by the pseudo-range corrections calculated as described above.
As is known in the art, the ellipsoid coordinate system associated with WGS-84 has the same origin as the Earth Centered, Earth Fixed (ECEF) cartesian coordinates of WGS-84, except that altitude (Z) dimension of the ECEF System begins at the center of the Earth while the altitude dimension of the ellipsoid system begins at sea level. As a result, transformation between the two systems is easily accomplished. In fact, GPS receivers provide position output in ellipsoidal coordinates, that is, latitude, longitude, and altitude, even though the position computations take place in (ECEF) cartesian coordinates. Thus, both types of coordinates are available from each GPS receiver. From the foregoing it will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.

Claims

Claims
1. A target vehicle location method for locating a target vehicle, comprising: dividing a predetermined area into grid segments having predetermined dimensions in latitude and longitude; assigning a reference waypoint to each grid segment at a predetermined location within the grid segment; generating synthetic latitude functions, time mapped onto each grid segment in accordance with a predetermined time period and sequence; generating synthetic longitude functions, time mapped onto each grid segment in accordance with a predetermined time period and sequence, the synthetic latitude and longitude functions together defining a plurality of time slots for each grid segment; providing the target vehicle with global position information indicating a position of the target vehicle in latitude and longitude coordinates; converting the global position information to relative position with respect to the reference waypoint of the grid segment in which the target vehicle is located; assigning a time slot for the target vehicle based upon its relative position within the grid segment in which it is located; and transmitting, during the assigned time slot, a data message containing information indicative of the target vehicle's position.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the target vehicle is an aircraft having an altitude and the transmitting step includes transmitting a data message containing information indicative of the altitude of the target aircraft.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the target vehicle is an aircraft with an altitude, the method further comprising: generating synthetic altitude functions, time mapped onto each grid segment in accordance with a predetermined time period and sequence, the synthetic latitude, longitude, and altitude functions together defining a plurality of time slots for each grid segment, and each time slot corresponds to a three dimensional position within the grid segment.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving at a parent vehicle the data message transmitted by the target vehicle; and displaying at the parent vehicle the position of the target vehicle if the target vehicle is within a predetermined range from the parent vehicle.
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising: monitoring at the parent vehicle the range of the target vehicle from the parent vehicle; and providing a warning indication if a the range of the target vehicle from the parent vehicle is within a predetermined minimum range.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the step of providing a warning indication includes displaying the bearing and range of the target vehicle.
7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving at a fixed ground control station the data message transmitted by the target vehicle; and displaying at the fixed ground control station the position of target vehicle if the target vehicle is within a predetermined range from the fixed ground control station.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the transmitting step includes transmitting the data message using a communications satellite transmitter adapted to transmit data messages via a communication satellite.
9. The method of claim 8, further comprising: receiving the data message at a fixed ground control station via the communication satellite; and displaying at the fixed ground control station the position of target vehicle if the target vehicle is within a predetermined range from the fixed ground control station.
10. The method of claim 8 wherein the predetermined area includes a plurality of air traffic control areas and the transmitting step includes transmitting the data message using a discrete channel that is unique to the air traffic control area in which the target aircraft is located.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein the target vehicle is of a first vehicle type and an additional target vehicle is of a second vehicle type, the method further comprising: transmitting from the additional target vehicle a data message containing information indicative of a position of the additional target vehicle, the data message transmitted by the additional target vehicle being transmitted over a discrete channel that is different from a discrete channel over which the target vehicle transmits its data message.
12. A vehicle location method for locating a target vehicle, comprising: providing global position information indicative of a position of the target vehicle in latitude and longitude coordinates; converting the global position information to a relative position with respect to a reference waypoint; assigning the target vehicle a time slot based on the target vehicle's relative position; and transmitting the target vehicle's global position information during the target vehicle's assigned time slot.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein the target vehicle is an aircraft having an altitude, the assigning step includes assigning the time slot based on the aircraft's relative latitude, longitude, and altitude with respect to the reference waypoint, and the transmitting step includes transmitting a data message containing information indicative of the altitude of the target aircraft.
14. The method of claim 12, further comprising: receiving at a parent vehicle the data message transmitted by the target vehicle; and displaying at the parent vehicle the position of target vehicle if the target vehicle is within a predetermined range from the parent vehicle.
15. The method of claim 14, further comprising: monitoring at the parent vehicle the range of the target vehicle from the parent vehicle; and providing a warning indication if a the range of the target vehicle from the parent vehicle is within a predetermined minimum range.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the step of providing a warning indication includes displaying the bearing and range of the target vehicle.
17. The method of claim 12, further comprising: receiving at a fixed ground control station the data message transmitted by the target vehicle; and displaying at the fixed ground control station the position of target vehicle if the target vehicle is within a predetermined range from the fixed ground control station.
18. The method of claim 12 wherein the transmitting step includes transmitting the data message using a communications satellite transmitter adapted to transmit data messages via a communication satellite.
19. The method of claim 18 further comprising: receiving the data message at a fixed ground control station via the communication satellite; and displaying at the fixed ground control station the position of target vehicle if the target vehicle is within a predetermined range from the fixed ground control station.
20. The method of claim 12 wherein the predetermined area includes a plurality of air traffic control areas and the transmitting step includes transmitting the data message using a discrete channel that is unique to the air traffic control area in which the target aircraft is located.
21. The method of claim 12 wherein the target vehicle is of a first vehicle type and an additional target vehicle is of a second vehicle type, the method further comprising: transmitting from the additional target vehicle a data message containing information indicative of a position of the additional target vehicle, the data message transmitted by the additional target vehicle being transmitted over a discrete channel that is different from a discrete channel over which the target vehicle transmits its data message.
22. The method according to claim 12 wherein the providing step includes: calculating a vehicle pseudo-range from the target vehicle to a GPS satellite; adjusting the vehicle pseudo-range by a GPS correction factor for the GPS satellite, thereby obtaining an actual vehicle range; and determining the position of the target vehicle in latitude and longitude coordinates based on the actual vehicle range.
23. The method according to claim 22 wherein the providing step further includes: calculating a ground station pseudo-range from a fixed ground station to the GPS satellite; calculating a ground station actual range indicative of a difference between surveyed coordinates of the ground station and an ephemeris of the satellite; and determining the GPS correction factor for the satellite based on a difference between the ground station pseudo-range and the ground station actual range.
24. The method according to claim 12 further including: calculating a ground station pseudo-range for each of a plurality of GPS satellites visible from a fixed ground station, each ground station pseudo-range being indicative of a distance from the ground station to a different one of the visible GPS satellites; calculating a ground station actual range for each of the plurality of visible GPS satellites, each ground station actual range being indicative of a difference between surveyed coordinates of the ground station and an ephemeris of a different one of the GPS satellites; and determining a GPS correction factor for each of the visible GPS satellites based on a difference between the ground station pseudo-range and the ground station actual range for the GPS satellite.
25. The method according to claim 12 wherein the providing step includes: receiving surveyed position coordinates of three ground stations at the target vehicle; transmitting a data message from each of the ground stations based on the relative position of the ground station with respect to the reference waypoint; receiving at the target vehicle each data message and recording the time at which the data message is received; calculating a travel time for each ground station, the travel time representing the length of time that the data message took to get from the ground station to the target vehicle; and determining a range from the each ground station to the target vehicle by scaling each travel time by the speed of light.
26. The method according to claim 25 wherein the providing step further includes: calculating three-dimensional position coordinates of the target vehicle based on the range and surveyed position coordinates of each ground station.
27. A vehicle location system for locating a target vehicle, comprising: a receiver aboard the target vehicle and adapted to receive global position information indicative of a position of the target vehicle in latitude and longitude coordinates; means for dividing a predetermined area into a plurality of grid segments having predetermined dimensions in latitude and longitude, each grid segment having a reference waypoint, the target vehicle being positioned in one of the grid segments; means for converting the global position information to a relative position with respect to the reference waypoint of the grid segment in which the target vehicle is located; means for assigning the target vehicle a time slot based on the target vehicle's relative position; and a transmitter adapted to transmit the target vehicle's global position information during the target vehicle's assigned time slot.
28. The vehicle location system of claim 27 wherein the target vehicle is an aircraft having an altitude, the relative position upon which the time slot is based includes the altitude of the aircraft, and the transmitter is adapted to transmit a data message containing information indicative of the altitude of the target aircraft.
29. The vehicle location system of claim 27, further comprising: a receiver at a parent vehicle, the receiver being adapted to receive the data message transmitted by the target vehicle; and a display at the parent vehicle, the display being adapted to display the position of target vehicle if the target vehicle is within a predetermined range from the parent vehicle.
30. The vehicle location system of claim 29, further comprising: means for monitoring at the parent vehicle the range of the target vehicle from the parent vehicle; and means for providing a warning indication if a the range of the target vehicle from the parent vehicle is within a predetermined minimum range.
31. The vehicle location system of claim 27, further comprising: a receiver at a fixed ground control station, the receiver being adapted to receive the data message transmitted by the target vehicle; and a display at the fixed ground control station, the display being adapted to display the position of target vehicle if the target vehicle is within a predetermined range from the fixed ground control station.
32. The vehicle location system of claim 27 wherein the transmitter includes a communications satellite transmitter adapted to transmit data messages via a communication satellite.
33. The vehicle location system of claim 32, further comprising: a satellite receiver at a fixed ground control station, the satellite receiver being adapted to receive the data messages via the communication satellite; and a display at the fixed ground control station, the display being adapted to receive the position of target vehicle if the target vehicle is within a predetermined range from the fixed ground control station.
34. A vehicle location system whereby position data regarding a target aircraft located on an airport surface are made available to other aircraft and to an airport traffic control tower by transmitting a data message containing position coordinates of the aircraft, during a uniquely defined time slot, comprising: means for dividing the airport surface into grid segments having predetermined dimensions in latitude and longitude; means for assigning a reference waypoint to each grid segment at a prede¬ termined location within the grid segment; means aboard the target aircraft for generating a synthetic latitude function time mapped onto the grid segment within which the target aircraft is located in accordance with a predetermined time period and sequence; means aboard the target aircraft for generating a synthetic longitude function time mapped onto the grid segment within which the target aircraft is located in accordance with a predetermined time period and sequence, the synthetic latitude and longitude functions together defining a plurality of time slots; means for assigning the target aircraft a time slot based on the relative position of the aircraft with respect to the reference waypoint for the grid segment in which the target aircraft is located; and a transmitter aboard the target aircraft, the transmitter being adapted to transmit the data message during the assigned time slot.
35. The vehicle location system of claim 34, further comprising: a receiver at a parent aircraft, the receiver being adapted to receive the data message transmitted by the target vehicle; and a display at the parent vehicle, the display being adapted to display the position of target vehicle if the target vehicle is within a predetermined range from the parent vehicle.
36. The vehicle location system of claim 34, further comprising: a receiver at the airport traffic control tower, the receiver being adapted to receive the data message transmitted by the target vehicle; and a display at the airport traffic control tower, the display being adapted to display the position of target vehicle if the target vehicle is within a predetermined range from the fixed ground control station.
37. A vehicle location method of locating a target vehicle, comprising: calculating a ground station pseudo-range for each of a plurality of GPS satellites visible from a fixed ground station, each ground station pseudo-range being indicative of a distance from the ground station to a different one of the visible GPS satellites; calculating a ground station actual range for each of the plurality of visible GPS satellites, each ground station actual range being indicative of a difference between surveyed coordinates of the ground station and an ephemeris of a different one of the GPS satellites; determining a GPS correction factor for each of the visible GPS satellites based on a difference between the ground station pseudo-range and the ground station actual range for the GPS satellite. calculating a vehicle pseudo-range from the target vehicle to a selected one of the GPS satellites; adjusting the vehicle pseudo-range by the GPS correction factor for the selected GPS satellite, thereby obtaining an actual vehicle range; and determining the position of the target vehicle in latitude and longitude coordinates based on the actual vehicle range.
PCT/US1994/014922 1993-12-22 1994-12-22 Vehicle location and collision avoidance system WO1995017685A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU15552/95A AU1555295A (en) 1993-12-22 1994-12-22 Vehicle location and collision avoidance system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/178,397 1993-12-22
US08/178,397 US5450329A (en) 1993-12-22 1993-12-22 Vehicle location method and system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1995017685A1 true WO1995017685A1 (en) 1995-06-29

Family

ID=22652395

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1994/014922 WO1995017685A1 (en) 1993-12-22 1994-12-22 Vehicle location and collision avoidance system

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US5450329A (en)
AU (1) AU1555295A (en)
WO (1) WO1995017685A1 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2752984A1 (en) * 1996-09-03 1998-03-06 Sextant Avionique METHOD FOR ASSISTING THE NAVIGATION OF A MOBILE TO AN ALSO MOBILE TARGET
GB2322248A (en) * 1997-02-06 1998-08-19 Fujitsu Ltd Position determination, processing and display
GB2356098A (en) * 1997-02-06 2001-05-09 Fujitsu Ltd Portable radio terminal for position information system
WO2004097448A1 (en) * 2003-04-28 2004-11-11 ST Electronics (Training & Simulation Systems) Pte Ltd. Grid-based transmission system
EP2015275A1 (en) * 2007-07-11 2009-01-14 Alcatel Lucent Method for tracking moving entities
US7965227B2 (en) 2006-05-08 2011-06-21 Era Systems, Inc. Aircraft tracking using low cost tagging as a discriminator
EP2568461A1 (en) * 2011-09-12 2013-03-13 Thales Method to track entities
EP3217734A1 (en) * 2016-03-11 2017-09-13 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Wireless device, communication method and computer readable storage medium

Families Citing this family (190)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10361802B1 (en) 1999-02-01 2019-07-23 Blanding Hovenweep, Llc Adaptive pattern recognition based control system and method
US8352400B2 (en) 1991-12-23 2013-01-08 Hoffberg Steven M Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore
US6437743B1 (en) * 1992-12-04 2002-08-20 Yosef Mintz Method and system for mapping and tracking information from a plurality of remote stations
SE515200C2 (en) * 1993-11-17 2001-06-25 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Distance Determination Procedure
EP0671634B1 (en) * 1994-03-11 2002-10-02 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Control target surveillance system
US5604715A (en) * 1994-06-21 1997-02-18 Aman; James A. Automated lumber unit trucking system
US7386401B2 (en) 1994-11-21 2008-06-10 Phatrat Technology, Llc Helmet that reports impact information, and associated methods
US6266623B1 (en) 1994-11-21 2001-07-24 Phatrat Technology, Inc. Sport monitoring apparatus for determining loft time, speed, power absorbed and other factors such as height
US8280682B2 (en) 2000-12-15 2012-10-02 Tvipr, Llc Device for monitoring movement of shipped goods
US5574469A (en) * 1994-12-21 1996-11-12 Burlington Northern Railroad Company Locomotive collision avoidance method and system
JPH08286257A (en) * 1995-04-18 1996-11-01 Konica Corp Data recorder for camera
US6148778A (en) 1995-05-17 2000-11-21 Sturman Industries, Inc. Air-fuel module adapted for an internal combustion engine
US7426437B2 (en) * 1997-10-22 2008-09-16 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Accident avoidance systems and methods
US7629899B2 (en) * 1997-10-22 2009-12-08 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Vehicular communication arrangement and method
US7110880B2 (en) * 1997-10-22 2006-09-19 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Communication method and arrangement
US6370475B1 (en) * 1997-10-22 2002-04-09 Intelligent Technologies International Inc. Accident avoidance system
US6720920B2 (en) 1997-10-22 2004-04-13 Intelligent Technologies International Inc. Method and arrangement for communicating between vehicles
US9443358B2 (en) 1995-06-07 2016-09-13 Automotive Vehicular Sciences LLC Vehicle software upgrade techniques
US7295925B2 (en) * 1997-10-22 2007-11-13 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Accident avoidance systems and methods
US7912645B2 (en) * 1997-10-22 2011-03-22 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Information transfer arrangement and method for vehicles
US7418346B2 (en) * 1997-10-22 2008-08-26 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Collision avoidance methods and systems
US6405132B1 (en) 1997-10-22 2002-06-11 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Accident avoidance system
US5646855A (en) * 1995-07-19 1997-07-08 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Waypoint navigation using exclusion zones
US5751612A (en) * 1995-08-24 1998-05-12 Lockheed Martin Corporation System and method for accurate and efficient geodetic database retrieval
US5835059A (en) * 1995-09-01 1998-11-10 Lockheed Martin Corporation Data link and method
US6249241B1 (en) * 1995-09-21 2001-06-19 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Marine vessel traffic system
US5748136A (en) * 1995-09-22 1998-05-05 Rockwell International Corporation Electronic landmark enhancement to GPS based navigation systems
US7358857B1 (en) 1996-03-27 2008-04-15 Symbol Technologies, Inc. Global positioning systems applications
US5872526A (en) * 1996-05-23 1999-02-16 Sun Microsystems, Inc. GPS collision avoidance system
US5703598A (en) * 1996-05-24 1997-12-30 Emmons; Ardath H. Method and system for tracking stolen property
US6020832A (en) * 1996-08-05 2000-02-01 Jensen; David D. Method and apparatus of automatically monitoring aircraft altitude
US5902341A (en) * 1996-10-30 1999-05-11 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Method and apparatus to automatically generate a train manifest
US6301238B1 (en) * 1997-01-28 2001-10-09 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Directional-beam generative apparatus and associated method
US6009355A (en) 1997-01-28 1999-12-28 American Calcar Inc. Multimedia information and control system for automobiles
US5933099A (en) * 1997-02-19 1999-08-03 Mahon; James Collision avoidance system
DE69818813D1 (en) * 1997-03-27 2003-11-13 Innovative Solutions & Support CALIBRATION METHOD OF HIGH SENSORS FOR AIRCRAFT
US6148261A (en) 1997-06-20 2000-11-14 American Calcar, Inc. Personal communication system to send and receive voice data positioning information
US6133853A (en) 1998-07-30 2000-10-17 American Calcar, Inc. Personal communication and positioning system
US6275231B1 (en) * 1997-08-01 2001-08-14 American Calcar Inc. Centralized control and management system for automobiles
US8255144B2 (en) * 1997-10-22 2012-08-28 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Intra-vehicle information conveyance system and method
US8965677B2 (en) 1998-10-22 2015-02-24 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Intra-vehicle information conveyance system and method
US5969643A (en) * 1998-02-23 1999-10-19 Westinghouse Air Brake Company Method and apparatus for determining relative locomotive position in a train consist
US6085991A (en) 1998-05-14 2000-07-11 Sturman; Oded E. Intensified fuel injector having a lateral drain passage
US6271765B1 (en) * 1998-06-02 2001-08-07 Lear Automotive Dearborn, Inc. Passive garage door opener
US6285878B1 (en) * 1998-06-12 2001-09-04 Joseph Lai Broadband wireless communication systems provided by commercial airlines
US6025774A (en) * 1998-06-24 2000-02-15 Forbes; Mark P. Method for retrieving vehicular collateral
US6977140B1 (en) * 1998-09-29 2005-12-20 Organ Recovery Systems, Inc. Method for maintaining and/or restoring viability of organs
JP3063848B2 (en) * 1998-10-07 2000-07-12 日本電気株式会社 DME system with broadcast function
EP1123581A4 (en) 1998-10-21 2005-08-10 American Calcar Inc Positional camera and gps data interchange device
US10240935B2 (en) 1998-10-22 2019-03-26 American Vehicular Sciences Llc Vehicle software upgrade techniques
US6243647B1 (en) * 1999-01-28 2001-06-05 International Business Machines Corporation Three dimensional display for time multiplexed global positioning system cell location beacon system
US6275771B1 (en) * 1999-01-28 2001-08-14 International Business Machines Corporation Time multiplexed global positioning system cell location beacon system
US6246954B1 (en) * 1999-01-28 2001-06-12 International Business Machines Corporation Time multiplexed global positioning system for control of traffic lights
US7966078B2 (en) 1999-02-01 2011-06-21 Steven Hoffberg Network media appliance system and method
US7570214B2 (en) 1999-03-05 2009-08-04 Era Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for ADS-B validation, active and passive multilateration, and elliptical surviellance
US8203486B1 (en) 1999-03-05 2012-06-19 Omnipol A.S. Transmitter independent techniques to extend the performance of passive coherent location
US7739167B2 (en) 1999-03-05 2010-06-15 Era Systems Corporation Automated management of airport revenues
US7782256B2 (en) 1999-03-05 2010-08-24 Era Systems Corporation Enhanced passive coherent location techniques to track and identify UAVs, UCAVs, MAVs, and other objects
US7908077B2 (en) 2003-06-10 2011-03-15 Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. Land use compatibility planning software
US7889133B2 (en) 1999-03-05 2011-02-15 Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. Multilateration enhancements for noise and operations management
US7612716B2 (en) 1999-03-05 2009-11-03 Era Systems Corporation Correlation of flight track data with other data sources
US7777675B2 (en) 1999-03-05 2010-08-17 Era Systems Corporation Deployable passive broadband aircraft tracking
US7667647B2 (en) 1999-03-05 2010-02-23 Era Systems Corporation Extension of aircraft tracking and positive identification from movement areas into non-movement areas
US8446321B2 (en) 1999-03-05 2013-05-21 Omnipol A.S. Deployable intelligence and tracking system for homeland security and search and rescue
AU3522500A (en) * 1999-03-11 2000-09-28 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Methods and apparatus for preventing vehicle accidents
US6836238B1 (en) * 2001-10-09 2004-12-28 Escort Inc. Police radar/laser detector with integral vehicle parameter display using a vehicle interface
US6614385B2 (en) 1999-06-14 2003-09-02 Escort Inc. Police activity transponder utilizing a vehicle interface
AU5874300A (en) * 1999-06-14 2001-01-02 Escort Inc. Radar warning receiver with position and velocity sensitive functions
US8525723B2 (en) * 1999-06-14 2013-09-03 Escort Inc. Radar detector with navigation function
JP3473510B2 (en) * 1999-07-21 2003-12-08 株式会社デンソー Map display device
US7783508B2 (en) 1999-09-20 2010-08-24 Numerex Corp. Method and system for refining vending operations based on wireless data
US6259976B1 (en) 1999-09-25 2001-07-10 Jerome H. Lemelson Fuzzy logic based emergency flight control with thrust vectoring
KR100749016B1 (en) 1999-10-19 2007-08-14 아메리칸 캘카어 인코포레이티드 Technique for effective navigation based on user preferences
EP1224577A4 (en) 1999-10-27 2003-05-28 American Calcar Inc System and method for user navigation
US6445344B1 (en) * 1999-11-16 2002-09-03 Northrop Grumman Corporation Local area positioning system
US6564146B1 (en) * 2000-01-24 2003-05-13 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Tracking system for providing position information
US6708090B2 (en) * 2000-02-29 2004-03-16 Honeywell International Inc. Method, apparatus and computer program product for managing line-of-sight communications
US6256559B1 (en) * 2000-03-13 2001-07-03 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Passive altimeter employing GPS signals
AU2001255352A1 (en) 2000-04-11 2001-10-23 American Calcar, Inc. Gps publication application server
US6469660B1 (en) 2000-04-13 2002-10-22 United Parcel Service Inc Method and system for displaying target icons correlated to target data integrity
DE60117539T2 (en) 2000-05-15 2006-12-21 Amouris, Konstantinos METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY DIVISING TIMELINE SLIDES OF A COMMON TDMA ROUND SEND CHANNEL TO A NETWORK OF TRANSMITTER / RECEIVER NODES
GB0014134D0 (en) * 2000-06-10 2000-08-02 Astrazeneca Ab Combination therapy
CA2416253A1 (en) 2000-07-28 2002-02-07 American Calcar Inc. Technique for effective organization and communication of information
US6371416B1 (en) * 2000-08-01 2002-04-16 New York Air Brake Corporation Portable beacons
US8990367B2 (en) 2006-09-29 2015-03-24 Dell Products L.P. Consistent binding of shared storage across clustered servers
KR20070118707A (en) * 2000-09-21 2007-12-17 아메리칸 캘카어 인코포레이티드 Technique for operating a vehicle effectively and safely
JP2004518213A (en) * 2000-10-25 2004-06-17 ユナイテッド パーセル サービス オブ アメリカ インコーポレイテッド Altitude range filter for cockpit traffic display
US7245928B2 (en) 2000-10-27 2007-07-17 Cellemetry, Llc Method and system for improved short message services
US8145367B2 (en) 2001-03-06 2012-03-27 Honeywell International Inc. Closed airport surface alerting system
US7587278B2 (en) 2002-05-15 2009-09-08 Honeywell International Inc. Ground operations and advanced runway awareness and advisory system
AU2002305426A1 (en) * 2001-05-07 2002-11-18 C3 Trans Systems Llc Autonomous vehicle collision/crossing warning system and method
GB2377123B (en) * 2001-05-31 2004-09-01 Telecom Consultants Internat L Efficient transmission and storage of location data
US6748325B1 (en) 2001-12-07 2004-06-08 Iwao Fujisaki Navigation system
US6662108B2 (en) * 2002-01-07 2003-12-09 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and apparatus for improving a vehicle safety system using a transponder and GPS
US6718237B1 (en) 2002-03-28 2004-04-06 Numerex Investment Corp. Method for reducing capacity demands for conveying geographic location information over capacity constrained wireless systems
US7079951B2 (en) * 2002-05-15 2006-07-18 Honeywell International Inc. Ground operations and imminent landing runway selection
US7751825B2 (en) 2002-06-27 2010-07-06 Qualcomm Incorporated Controlling geographic location information of devices operating in wireless communication systems
US6833811B2 (en) * 2002-10-07 2004-12-21 Harris Corporation System and method for highly accurate real time tracking and location in three dimensions
KR100532919B1 (en) * 2002-11-05 2005-12-02 기아자동차주식회사 Information reading system of accident vehicles
US6928339B2 (en) * 2002-11-21 2005-08-09 Reinke Manufacturing Company, Inc. GPS-based control system and method for controlling mechanized irrigation systems
US7099774B2 (en) * 2003-01-21 2006-08-29 Byron King GPS based vehicle warning and location system
WO2004066240A2 (en) * 2003-01-21 2004-08-05 Byron King Gps based vehicle warning and location system and method
US9818136B1 (en) 2003-02-05 2017-11-14 Steven M. Hoffberg System and method for determining contingent relevance
KR20040072439A (en) * 2003-02-12 2004-08-18 엘지전자 주식회사 Device and method for position display in navigation system
DE10308913A1 (en) * 2003-02-28 2004-09-30 Ais Advanced Infodata Systems Gmbh Aircraft safety system uses a data representation of the earth's surface in which a high resolution data mesh provides position and height data
CN100339682C (en) * 2003-05-14 2007-09-26 行毅科技股份有限公司 Navigation method and system for vehicle
US7313143B1 (en) * 2003-09-26 2007-12-25 Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. Method for diversity site group operations in air/ground communications
US6957130B1 (en) 2003-10-21 2005-10-18 Garmin At, Inc. Navigational instrument, method and computer program product for displaying ground traffic information
US7308343B1 (en) 2003-10-21 2007-12-11 Garmin At, Inc. Navigational instrument, method and computer program product for displaying ground traffic information
US20070138347A1 (en) * 2004-12-16 2007-06-21 Ehlers Gregory A System and method for providing information to an operator of a vehicle
US7174153B2 (en) * 2003-12-23 2007-02-06 Gregory A Ehlers System and method for providing information to an operator of an emergency response vehicle
US7323970B1 (en) 2004-01-21 2008-01-29 Numerex Corporation Method and system for remote interaction with a vehicle via wireless communication
US7233863B2 (en) * 2004-03-12 2007-06-19 Albert Rodriguez GPS location finding device
JP4327000B2 (en) * 2004-04-02 2009-09-09 古野電気株式会社 Counterpart movement monitoring device
JP4286730B2 (en) * 2004-06-30 2009-07-01 三菱電機株式会社 Mobile information sharing system
CH699530B1 (en) * 2005-03-07 2010-03-31 Klaus Kuhlgatz System and method for the holistic farming of ships.
US7479925B2 (en) * 2005-03-23 2009-01-20 Honeywell International Inc. Airport runway collision avoidance system and method
US20070001035A1 (en) * 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 Reinke Manufacturing Company, Inc. GPS guidance system for linear move irrigation apparatus
US7437225B1 (en) * 2005-07-29 2008-10-14 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Flight management system
US8874477B2 (en) 2005-10-04 2014-10-28 Steven Mark Hoffberg Multifactorial optimization system and method
WO2007047889A2 (en) 2005-10-18 2007-04-26 Phatrat Technology, Llc Shoe wear-out sensor, body-bar sensing system, unitless activity assessment and associated methods
US7546182B2 (en) * 2006-02-21 2009-06-09 Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. Inter vehicular ad hoc routing protocol and communication system
WO2007136723A2 (en) 2006-05-17 2007-11-29 Numerex Corp. System and method for prolonging wireless data product's life
US9137309B2 (en) 2006-05-22 2015-09-15 Apple Inc. Calibration techniques for activity sensing devices
US20070271116A1 (en) 2006-05-22 2007-11-22 Apple Computer, Inc. Integrated media jukebox and physiologic data handling application
US8073984B2 (en) 2006-05-22 2011-12-06 Apple Inc. Communication protocol for use with portable electronic devices
US7643895B2 (en) 2006-05-22 2010-01-05 Apple Inc. Portable media device with workout support
US7913297B2 (en) 2006-08-30 2011-03-22 Apple Inc. Pairing of wireless devices using a wired medium
US7813715B2 (en) 2006-08-30 2010-10-12 Apple Inc. Automated pairing of wireless accessories with host devices
US7576679B1 (en) * 2007-01-05 2009-08-18 Escort Inc. Radar detector with position and velocity sensitive functions
US7804440B1 (en) 2007-01-05 2010-09-28 Escort Inc. Radar detector with position and velocity sensitive functions
CA2677297C (en) 2007-02-06 2014-01-28 Michael Marett Service escrowed transportable wireless event reporting system
US7698101B2 (en) 2007-03-07 2010-04-13 Apple Inc. Smart garment
US8198980B1 (en) 2007-09-21 2012-06-12 Luger Dale J Numeric geodesic locator
US7969346B2 (en) * 2008-10-07 2011-06-28 Honeywell International Inc. Transponder-based beacon transmitter for see and avoid of unmanned aerial vehicles
EP2345022A1 (en) * 2008-10-10 2011-07-20 Raytheon Company Tracking air and ground vehicles
US20100179712A1 (en) * 2009-01-15 2010-07-15 Honeywell International Inc. Transparent vehicle skin and methods for viewing vehicle systems and operating status
DE102009008241A1 (en) * 2009-02-10 2010-08-12 Volkswagen Ag Method for determining time slot for data transmission for providing communication between e.g. passenger car and lorry, involves determining data transmission time slots in time interval depending on determined position of vehicles
US8373588B2 (en) * 2009-02-20 2013-02-12 Escort Inc. Wireless connectivity in a radar detector
US8624771B2 (en) * 2009-02-20 2014-01-07 Escort Inc. Wireless connectivity in a radar detector
US8604965B2 (en) * 2010-02-26 2013-12-10 Federal Aviation Administration/Department of Transportation Apparatus and method to generate and detect virtual targets
US20110238308A1 (en) * 2010-03-26 2011-09-29 Isaac Thomas Miller Pedal navigation using leo signals and body-mounted sensors
US8774837B2 (en) 2011-04-30 2014-07-08 John Anthony Wright Methods, systems and apparatuses of emergency vehicle locating and the disruption thereof
US8692705B2 (en) * 2011-09-21 2014-04-08 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Apparatus and method for generating low latency position information from position signals transmitted in a narrow bandwidth channel of a radio frequency
TWI471582B (en) 2012-03-30 2015-02-01 Nat Univ Tsing Hua Road side data exchange net and method thereof
US9606217B2 (en) * 2012-05-01 2017-03-28 5D Robotics, Inc. Collaborative spatial positioning
JP5989414B2 (en) * 2012-06-18 2016-09-07 株式会社東芝 Moving body information display device
US9618625B2 (en) 2012-07-06 2017-04-11 Apple Inc. System and method for continuous carrier wave reconstruction
US9360557B1 (en) 2012-07-06 2016-06-07 Apple Inc. Systems, methods, devices and subassemblies for rapid-acquisition access to high-precision positioning, navigation and/or timing solutions
RU2516868C1 (en) * 2012-12-25 2014-05-20 Открытое акционерное общество "Научно-производственное предприятие "Полет" System for radio communication with mobile objects
US9645248B2 (en) * 2012-12-28 2017-05-09 Trimble Inc. Vehicle-based global navigation satellite system receiver system with radio frequency hardware component
US9019092B1 (en) * 2013-03-08 2015-04-28 Allstate Insurance Company Determining whether a vehicle is parked for automated accident detection, fault attribution, and claims processing
US8799034B1 (en) 2013-03-08 2014-08-05 Allstate University Company Automated accident detection, fault attribution, and claims processing
US10963966B1 (en) 2013-09-27 2021-03-30 Allstate Insurance Company Electronic exchange of insurance information
US10032226B1 (en) 2013-03-08 2018-07-24 Allstate Insurance Company Automatic exchange of information in response to a collision event
US10165755B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-01-01 GPSip, Inc. Wireless location assisted zone guidance system region lookup
US10292365B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-05-21 GPSip, Inc. Wireless location assisted zone guidance system incorporating shepherding of wayward dogs
US9961884B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2018-05-08 GPSip, Inc. Wireless location assisted zone guidance system compatible with large and small land zones
US10064390B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2018-09-04 GPSip, Inc. Wireless location assisted zone guidance system incorporating a multi-zone containment area
US10172325B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-01-08 GPSip, Inc. Wireless location assisted zone guidance system incorporating dynamically variable intervals between sequential position requests
US10470437B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-11-12 GPSip, Inc. Wireless location assisted zone guidance system
US20150216142A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-08-06 GPSip, Inc. Wireless Location Assisted Zone Guidance System
US10251371B1 (en) * 2014-03-18 2019-04-09 GPSip, Inc. Wireless location assisted zone guidance system incorporating a system and apparatus for predicting the departure of an animal from a safe zone prior to the animal actually departing
US10342218B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-07-09 GPSip, Inc. GPS dog fence incorporating location guidance and positive reinforcement training
KR101509893B1 (en) * 2013-06-25 2015-04-07 현대자동차주식회사 Apparatus and Method for Communication of Vehicles
RU2538187C1 (en) * 2013-07-09 2015-01-10 Открытое акционерное общество "Горизонт" Ground-based small-size transport system for illuminating coastal environment
US10572943B1 (en) 2013-09-10 2020-02-25 Allstate Insurance Company Maintaining current insurance information at a mobile device
US9443270B1 (en) 2013-09-17 2016-09-13 Allstate Insurance Company Obtaining insurance information in response to optical input
RU2535923C1 (en) * 2013-10-15 2014-12-20 Открытое акционерное общество "Научно-производственное предприятие "Полет" System for radio communication with mobile objects
RU2535922C1 (en) * 2013-10-15 2014-12-20 Открытое акционерное общество "Научно-производственное предприятие "Полет" System for radio communication with mobile objects
US10165756B1 (en) 2014-03-18 2019-01-01 GPSip, Inc. Wireless location assisted zone guidance system incorporating a rapid collar mount and non-necrotic stimulation
US10624319B2 (en) 2014-03-18 2020-04-21 GPSip, Inc. Wireless location assisted zone guidance system incorporating a rapid collar mount and non-necrotic stimulation
CN105387841B (en) * 2014-08-20 2019-05-17 株式会社堀场制作所 Height detecting device, load driving apparatus and height detection method
US10713717B1 (en) 2015-01-22 2020-07-14 Allstate Insurance Company Total loss evaluation and handling system and method
FR3044775B1 (en) * 2015-12-08 2017-12-29 Sigfox METHOD FOR SELECTING, BY A TERMINAL, A COMMUNICATION MODE FOR EXCHANGING DATA WITH BASE STATIONS
US9596666B1 (en) 2015-12-11 2017-03-14 Uber Technologies, Inc. System for processing asynchronous sensor data
US10101747B2 (en) 2015-12-11 2018-10-16 Uber Technologies, Inc. Formatting sensor data for use in autonomous vehicle communications platform
US9785150B2 (en) 2015-12-11 2017-10-10 Uber Technologies, Inc. Formatting sensor data for use in autonomous vehicle communications platform
US9537956B1 (en) * 2015-12-11 2017-01-03 Uber Technologies, Inc. System for acquiring time-synchronized sensor data
US10114103B2 (en) 2016-03-31 2018-10-30 Uber Technologies, Inc. System and method for sensor triggering for synchronized operation
US10482559B2 (en) 2016-11-11 2019-11-19 Uatc, Llc Personalizing ride experience based on contextual ride usage data
US10937103B1 (en) 2017-04-21 2021-03-02 Allstate Insurance Company Machine learning based accident assessment
EP3769044A4 (en) 2018-03-17 2021-12-22 GPSIP, Inc. Wireless location assisted zone guidance system incorporating secure transmission of location
RU2692696C1 (en) * 2018-09-11 2019-06-26 Акционерное общество "Научно-производственное предприятие "Полет" Radio communication system with mobile objects using radio-photon elements
CA3125545A1 (en) 2018-12-31 2020-07-09 GPSip, Inc. Wireless location assisted zone guidance system incorporating a rapid collar mount and non-necrotic stimulation
EP4022479A4 (en) 2019-09-18 2023-09-13 GPSIP, Inc. Wireless location assisted zone guidance system incorporating secure transmission of location
CN111429760B (en) * 2020-03-30 2021-10-08 中国民用航空飞行学院 Multidimensional aircraft collision and conflict risk evaluation system
RU2746148C1 (en) * 2020-07-17 2021-04-07 Акционерное общество "Научно-производственное предприятие "Полет" Mobile radio communication system
WO2022091229A1 (en) * 2020-10-27 2022-05-05 Aaron Sanjaya Benedek Flight management apparatus, flying object, flight management system, flight management method, flight control method and program
WO2024046593A1 (en) * 2022-09-02 2024-03-07 Flarm Technology Ag Aircraft collision avoidance method and device

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4380050A (en) * 1980-06-30 1983-04-12 Tanner Jesse H Aircraft location and collision avoidance system
US4674051A (en) * 1985-05-21 1987-06-16 Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. Navigation point locating system
US5045860A (en) * 1990-06-27 1991-09-03 R & D Associates Method and arrangement for probabilistic determination of a target location
US5119102A (en) * 1990-02-28 1992-06-02 U.S. Philips Corporation Vehicle location system
US5181027A (en) * 1990-01-24 1993-01-19 Rockwell International Corporation Method and apparatus for an air traffic control system
US5208591A (en) * 1989-09-29 1993-05-04 Honeywell Inc. Track extension for use with ATCRBS surveillance procedures
US5225842A (en) * 1991-05-09 1993-07-06 Navsys Corporation Vehicle tracking system employing global positioning system (gps) satellites

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3573818A (en) * 1968-08-15 1971-04-06 Sierra Research Corp Follow-the-leader stationkeeper system
US3808598A (en) * 1972-11-06 1974-04-30 Robbins T Aircraft collision warning system
US3947845A (en) * 1974-04-19 1976-03-30 Rca Corporation Altitude coding for collision avoidance system
US4063244A (en) * 1975-09-26 1977-12-13 Odom Offshore Surveys, Inc. Receiver/timing apparatus for a single frequency, time-shared positioning system
US4710774A (en) * 1986-02-18 1987-12-01 Gunny Edmond R Aircraft collision avoidance system
US4835537A (en) * 1986-07-16 1989-05-30 Manion James H Telemetry burst collision avoidance system
US4812990A (en) * 1987-04-29 1989-03-14 Merit Technology Incorporated System and method for optimizing aircraft flight path
JP2609292B2 (en) * 1988-06-22 1997-05-14 株式会社日立製作所 GPS positioning device
US5032845A (en) * 1990-02-08 1991-07-16 D.G.R., Inc. Vehicle locating system with Loran-C
US5214757A (en) * 1990-08-07 1993-05-25 Georesearch, Inc. Interactive automated mapping system
US5153836A (en) * 1990-08-22 1992-10-06 Edward J. Fraughton Universal dynamic navigation, surveillance, emergency location, and collision avoidance system and method
US5202829A (en) * 1991-06-10 1993-04-13 Trimble Navigation Limited Exploration system and method for high-accuracy and high-confidence level relative position and velocity determinations

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4380050A (en) * 1980-06-30 1983-04-12 Tanner Jesse H Aircraft location and collision avoidance system
US4674051A (en) * 1985-05-21 1987-06-16 Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. Navigation point locating system
US5208591A (en) * 1989-09-29 1993-05-04 Honeywell Inc. Track extension for use with ATCRBS surveillance procedures
US5181027A (en) * 1990-01-24 1993-01-19 Rockwell International Corporation Method and apparatus for an air traffic control system
US5119102A (en) * 1990-02-28 1992-06-02 U.S. Philips Corporation Vehicle location system
US5045860A (en) * 1990-06-27 1991-09-03 R & D Associates Method and arrangement for probabilistic determination of a target location
US5225842A (en) * 1991-05-09 1993-07-06 Navsys Corporation Vehicle tracking system employing global positioning system (gps) satellites

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1998010308A1 (en) * 1996-09-03 1998-03-12 Sextant Avionique Method of air navigation assistance for guiding a moving vehicle towards a moving target
FR2752984A1 (en) * 1996-09-03 1998-03-06 Sextant Avionique METHOD FOR ASSISTING THE NAVIGATION OF A MOBILE TO AN ALSO MOBILE TARGET
GB2322248A (en) * 1997-02-06 1998-08-19 Fujitsu Ltd Position determination, processing and display
GB2356098A (en) * 1997-02-06 2001-05-09 Fujitsu Ltd Portable radio terminal for position information system
GB2356098B (en) * 1997-02-06 2001-10-03 Fujitsu Ltd Portable radio terminal
GB2322248B (en) * 1997-02-06 2001-10-17 Fujitsu Ltd Position information management system
US6999779B1 (en) 1997-02-06 2006-02-14 Fujitsu Limited Position information management system
US7756529B2 (en) 1997-02-06 2010-07-13 Fujitsu Limited Position information management method and apparatus
US7756527B2 (en) 1997-02-06 2010-07-13 Fujitsu Limited Position information management system
US7904242B2 (en) 2003-04-28 2011-03-08 St Electronics (Training And Simulation Systems) Pte. Ltd. Grid-based transmission system
WO2004097448A1 (en) * 2003-04-28 2004-11-11 ST Electronics (Training & Simulation Systems) Pte Ltd. Grid-based transmission system
US7965227B2 (en) 2006-05-08 2011-06-21 Era Systems, Inc. Aircraft tracking using low cost tagging as a discriminator
EP2015275A1 (en) * 2007-07-11 2009-01-14 Alcatel Lucent Method for tracking moving entities
US8831863B2 (en) 2007-07-11 2014-09-09 Alcatel Lucent Method for tracking moving entities
EP2568461A1 (en) * 2011-09-12 2013-03-13 Thales Method to track entities
FR2980024A1 (en) * 2011-09-12 2013-03-15 Thales Sa METHOD FOR MONITORING ENTITIES
US8694029B2 (en) 2011-09-12 2014-04-08 Thales Method for monitoring entities
EP3217734A1 (en) * 2016-03-11 2017-09-13 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Wireless device, communication method and computer readable storage medium

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU1555295A (en) 1995-07-10
US5450329A (en) 1995-09-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5450329A (en) Vehicle location method and system
US3750166A (en) Pilot data system
CA2596063C (en) Precision approach guidance system and associated method
US4910526A (en) Airborne surveillance method and system
US4454510A (en) Discrete address beacon, navigation and landing system (DABNLS)
US5596332A (en) Aircraft location and identification system
US5099245A (en) Vehicle location system accuracy enhancement for airborne vehicles
US6006158A (en) Airport guidance and safety system incorporating lighting control using GNSS compatible methods
US5075694A (en) Airborne surveillance method and system
US6219594B1 (en) Landing area obstacle detection radar system
US20050182530A1 (en) Global navigation satellite system landing systems and methods
EP0346461B1 (en) Vehicle location system accuracy enhancement for airborne vehicles
US4380050A (en) Aircraft location and collision avoidance system
US20150066240A1 (en) Autonomous precision navigation
US20120001793A1 (en) Radar registration using targets of opportunity
WO1998043107A1 (en) Satellite-based collision avoidance system and method therefor
US20100106416A1 (en) Aircraft navigation using the global positioning system, inertial reference system, and distance measurements
US7054739B2 (en) Radio navigation system
KR20170048087A (en) Aircraft Landing Apparatus Using GNSS and SBAS Singals, and Control Method Thereof
Bhatti Improved integrity algorithms for integrated GPS/INS systems in the presence of slowly growing errors
US4733241A (en) Position finding and collision avoidance system
Kayton Navigation: land, sea, air & space
US3130401A (en) Navigation system
RU113243U1 (en) RADIOTECHNICAL COMPLEX OF NAVIGATION AND MANAGEMENT OF FLIGHTS OF AIRCRAFT MARINE BASING
Salih et al. The suitability of GPS receivers update rates for navigation applications

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AM AT AU BB BG BR BY CA CN CZ FI GE HU JP KE KG KP KR KZ LK LT LV MD MG MN MW NO NZ PL RO RU SD SI SK TJ TT UA UZ VN

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): KE MW SD SZ AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase