US20070142995A1 - Adaptation of an automatic distance control to traffic users potentially merging into the lane thereof - Google Patents

Adaptation of an automatic distance control to traffic users potentially merging into the lane thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070142995A1
US20070142995A1 US10/582,286 US58228604A US2007142995A1 US 20070142995 A1 US20070142995 A1 US 20070142995A1 US 58228604 A US58228604 A US 58228604A US 2007142995 A1 US2007142995 A1 US 2007142995A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
vehicle
lane
traffic
speed
equipped vehicle
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/582,286
Inventor
Bernd Wotlermann
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Daimler AG
Original Assignee
DaimlerChrysler AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by DaimlerChrysler AG filed Critical DaimlerChrysler AG
Assigned to DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG reassignment DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: WOLTERMANN, BERND
Publication of US20070142995A1 publication Critical patent/US20070142995A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W30/00Purposes of road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. of systems using conjoint control of vehicle sub-units, or advanced driver assistance systems for ensuring comfort, stability and safety or drive control systems for propelling or retarding the vehicle
    • B60W30/14Adaptive cruise control
    • B60W30/16Control of distance between vehicles, e.g. keeping a distance to preceding vehicle
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60KARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PROPULSION UNITS OR OF TRANSMISSIONS IN VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PLURAL DIVERSE PRIME-MOVERS IN VEHICLES; AUXILIARY DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; INSTRUMENTATION OR DASHBOARDS FOR VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH COOLING, AIR INTAKE, GAS EXHAUST OR FUEL SUPPLY OF PROPULSION UNITS IN VEHICLES
    • B60K31/00Vehicle fittings, acting on a single sub-unit only, for automatically controlling vehicle speed, i.e. preventing speed from exceeding an arbitrarily established velocity or maintaining speed at a particular velocity, as selected by the vehicle operator
    • B60K31/0008Vehicle fittings, acting on a single sub-unit only, for automatically controlling vehicle speed, i.e. preventing speed from exceeding an arbitrarily established velocity or maintaining speed at a particular velocity, as selected by the vehicle operator including means for detecting potential obstacles in vehicle path
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W40/00Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models
    • B60W40/02Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models related to ambient conditions
    • B60W40/04Traffic conditions
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W40/00Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models
    • B60W40/10Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models related to vehicle motion
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V20/00Scenes; Scene-specific elements
    • G06V20/50Context or environment of the image
    • G06V20/52Surveillance or monitoring of activities, e.g. for recognising suspicious objects
    • G06V20/54Surveillance or monitoring of activities, e.g. for recognising suspicious objects of traffic, e.g. cars on the road, trains or boats
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/16Anti-collision systems
    • G08G1/161Decentralised systems, e.g. inter-vehicle communication
    • G08G1/163Decentralised systems, e.g. inter-vehicle communication involving continuous checking
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2552/00Input parameters relating to infrastructure
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2552/00Input parameters relating to infrastructure
    • B60W2552/05Type of road
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2552/00Input parameters relating to infrastructure
    • B60W2552/10Number of lanes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2554/00Input parameters relating to objects
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2554/00Input parameters relating to objects
    • B60W2554/40Dynamic objects, e.g. animals, windblown objects
    • B60W2554/404Characteristics
    • B60W2554/4041Position
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2554/00Input parameters relating to objects
    • B60W2554/40Dynamic objects, e.g. animals, windblown objects
    • B60W2554/404Characteristics
    • B60W2554/4042Longitudinal speed
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2554/00Input parameters relating to objects
    • B60W2554/80Spatial relation or speed relative to objects
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2554/00Input parameters relating to objects
    • B60W2554/80Spatial relation or speed relative to objects
    • B60W2554/804Relative longitudinal speed
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W2556/00Input parameters relating to data
    • B60W2556/45External transmission of data to or from the vehicle
    • B60W2556/50External transmission of data to or from the vehicle for navigation systems

Definitions

  • the invention concerns a process for adapting the distance control for automatic safe following in motor vehicles to traffic users merging into their lane, as well as a device suitable for carrying out the process.
  • EP0605104A1 An example of a device of this general type is described in European Laid Open Publication EP0605104A1, which device includes a distance sensor, an evaluation unit and an adjustable speed influencing servo device which is under the control of control parameters calculated by the evaluation unit.
  • the distance sensor is, for a example, a millimeter wavelength radar, a lidar or an ultrasound sensor and senses the environment ahead of the road vehicle in order to detect objects or traffic users located therein.
  • the sensor angle is therein generally selected such that objects on adjacent lanes can also be detected.
  • the environment data detected by the distance sensor is transmitted to the evaluation unit, so that, having knowledge of the speed of the equipped vehicle, the speed of the other detected traffic users can be arrived at.
  • a speed-dependent following time t f is computed. If the equipped vehicle has a higher speed than a recognized preceding traffic user in the same lane, then the following time t f continuously decreases. If this decrease reaches a preset threshold, then the evaluation unit produces a control parameter or signal which acts on the speed governing servo device in such a manner that the speed of the equipped vehicle is reduced.
  • the distinction as to whether an object or a traffic user is located in the same lane or an adjacent lane occurs herein on the basis of a defined lane breadth.
  • the evaluation unit determines, using the data from the distance sensor, also the direction of movement of the traffic users in adjacent lanes. If the traffic user moves from an adjacent lane into the defined lane breadth, then the evaluation unit evaluates this traffic user as closest traffic user and controls the speed of the equipped vehicle to be so far below it that the following time t f is maintained with respect to this traffic user.
  • This control operation however, in particular in “pincers” movements (hazards closing in from both sides of the equipped vehicle), frequently leads to an abrupt reduction in the speed of the equipped vehicle, since traffic users changing into lane of other traffic frequently leave only a very small spacing between vehicles following behind them in their lane.
  • German Laid Open Publication DE10160189A1 In order to attenuate or cushion this type of abrupt speed change, it is proposed in German Laid Open Publication DE10160189A1, to design the rules of behavior of the system for automatic following guidance in such a manner that upon detecting a traffic user in the vicinity of a road merger or junction it takes note of this fact and in connection therewith recognizes that the ahead lying road area approaches the own lane. Subsequently an increased alertness of the area detected by the distance sensor is observed for merging vehicles. On the basis of the recognition that a potential merging vehicle is located in the immediate vicinity, it can be more rapidly and reliably detected already in the first detection cycle in which it is recognized by the distance sensor and identified as such. In this manner a relevant merging vehicle can already be recognized very early, so that more time remains for adjusting the following time t f and as a result the speed of the equipped vehicle is reduced less abruptly.
  • German Patent DE198 04 944C2 For increasing the time necessary for adjusting the following time t f and for creating a more comfortable following guidance conforming more closely to the human driving behavior of a vehicle, it is proposed in German Patent DE198 04 944C2 to detect the transverse acceleration of a traffic user located in the adjacent lane and approaching the lane of the equipped vehicle. If herein a transverse speed of a traffic user located in an adjacent lane towards the equipped vehicle is detected, then a conclusion is drawn as to an imminent merging. Accordingly, here also the environment area observed by the distance sensor is widened, in order to better observe this merging vehicle.
  • the task of the invention is thus to provide a process for adaptation of an automatic safe following distance guidance of a vehicle ( 10 ) to a traffic user merging into ones own lane (B), as well as a device suitable for carrying out this process, which avoids abrupt speed changes of the vehicle in the adjustment of the following time to the traffic user and to imitate the driving behavior of a human motor vehicle operator.
  • the controlled parameters for the servo means acting on the vehicle ( 10 ) are produced in such a manner, that the driving behavior of the road vehicle ( 10 ) adapts to the at least one detected traffic user ( 20 ) depending upon its vehicle speed and/or position.
  • the invention therewith which makes it possible, from recognition of the own vehicle position and with reference to supplemental additional information describing the course of the road in a mode and manner looking to the future to already early so adjust the speed of the vehicle that for a potential merging traffic already early place has been provided, which leads to a significantly more harmonious driving behavior.
  • the operator of the motor vehicle has the feeling that the system drives by looking ahead in the manner of an ideal human driving behavior.
  • the evaluation unit does not exert influence by the production of servo or controlled parameters on the speed of the own vehicle.
  • the progression guidance does not react in this type of this situation to the recognized traffic user, since in the case of a conventional mode of driving the traffic user it is not reliably recognized that the traffic user will carry out a lane change; in such a situation the human driver of the own vehicle will also not react to this traffic user with a change of the vehicle speed, rather he would maintain the vehicle speed and only carefully observe the driving behavior of the other traffic user.
  • the functionality of the invention is not limited to the forward looking recognition of merging behavior on on-ramps, but can rather for example in the same manner also be employed advantageously in situations in which in the ahead lying course of the road the number of drivable lanes is reduced and wherein the traffic users located on the disappearing lane must merge to the remaining lanes.
  • FIG. 1 Shows a merging situation on an on ramp on a multi-lane road.
  • FIG. 2 Shows the scene corresponding to FIG. 1 , in which vehicles involved in the merging process are located at other positions.
  • FIG. 3 Likewise shows the scene corresponding to FIG. 1 or 2 , in which the vehicles involved in the merging process are again located at other positions.
  • FIG. 4 Likewise shows a scene corresponding to FIGS. 1, 2 or 3 , in which the merging vehicles are located in the dead zone area of the merging vehicle.
  • FIG. 1 A typical merging situation on an on ramp of a multi-lane road is illustrated in FIG. 1 .
  • a vehicle 10 moves along a multi-lane road with lanes A and B on lane B in the direction of the directional arrow 11 .
  • the C corresponds to an on and off ramp onto the roadway with the lanes A and B.
  • the vehicle 10 is equipped with an inventive system for recognition of merging vehicles, wherein the limitations of a for example sensing or detection range of the separate sensor included in the system is indicated by dashed lines 12 .
  • the sensing area of the separation sensor is so arranged that it overlaps wide areas of lanes A, B, and C.
  • a vehicle 20 is moving along lane C, which is located in the sensing area 12 of the separation sensor and therewith is detected by the inventive system. Based on the assumption of a typical driving behavior it is then to be presumed, that the vehicle 20 will change from lane C to lane B along a trajectory 21 a or 21 b or 21 c (or a similar trajectory). Whatever the possible trajectory is selected by the driver of the vehicle in the course of his change or merging process is selected cannot be predicted in a situation as illustrated in FIG. 1 , since the vehicle is still driving straight ahead and therewith no significant transverse movement can be measured. By means of the evaluation of the sensor data of the separation sensor however the relative speed of the vehicle 20 can be measured in reference to the own vehicle 10 .
  • the relative speed of the vehicle 20 relative to vehicle to 10 should be taken into consideration in determining the servo parameters for the vehicle brake system.
  • the separation of the own vehicle 10 to the at least one detected traffic user 20 is so large, that the reduction and speed of the own vehicle 10 occurs with moderation.
  • the operator of the own vehicle 10 is not disturbed by oscillations in distance between the vehicles or a moderate approaching of the own vehicle to the other vehicle 20 and corresponds essentially to his own natural driving behavior. In those cases, as shown for example in FIG.
  • the reduction and speed of the own vehicle 10 can advantageously occur rapidly.
  • the other vehicle 20 is located close to the end of the on ramp, so that, in accordance with conventional driving behavior, it can be presumed, that the merging maneuver from lane C to lane B would occur very soon along trajectory 22 .
  • this could in advantageous manner also be so controlled, that a change in lane to an adjacent, away from the detected traffic user 20 (here: lane A) is carried out along for example trajectory 13 .
  • lane A a change in lane to an adjacent, away from the detected traffic user 20
  • the result of a checking and monitoring of this type of the occupancy condition of a possible evasion lane can lead to a decision regarding suitable means for reaction to a eminent merging vehicle 20 ; that is it can be decided whether the operator of the vehicle 10 would prefer a rapid breaking of his own vehicle or whether a deviation to lane A would be considered more natural and comfortable.
  • FIG. 3 a traffic situation is illustrated, in which the separation of the own vehicle 10 to the at least one traffic user 20 in the detection area 12 is relatively small, it however in accordance with the conventional driving behavior still has time remaining for a lane change, the speed of the own vehicle 10 is not reduced since vehicle 10 moves in general substantially faster than the other vehicle 20 it will speedily over take this, so that the operator of the other vehicle 20 can merge behind 10 onto lane B without problem.
  • the traffic situation or the traffic regulations or a setting of the cruise control system (Tempomat, Distronic) permit this.
  • FIG. 4 shows a further merger situation of an on ramp.
  • the own vehicle 10 moves along a multi-lane highway with lanes A and B along lane B in the direction of the indicating 11 .
  • a vehicle in traffic 30 which moves in the direction of the indicating arrow 31 .
  • a further vehicle 20 moves along lane C, this is however located in the blind area of the own vehicle 10 and is detected by a blind angle monitoring system integrated in the own vehicle 10 .
  • the other vehicle 20 will change lane from C to lane B along the trajectory 24 or similar trajectory between the vehicles 10 , 30 .
  • the inventive process and the inventive device allow themselves to be used to merge from a lane traveled by a vehicle 10 containing the invention to an adjacent lane, upon which other traffic users are located.
  • it is in particular with access to the environment information from the adjacent street areas decided whether the vehicle 10 should merge ahead of or after in particular traffic user traveling there.

Abstract

According to the invention, the security and driving comfort on driving road vehicles is increased by the fitting thereof with automatic systems for distance control and traffic separation. The operating properties of vehicles filled with such systems may be better adapted to traffic users merging into the lane thereof and the operating properties essentially better matched to those of a human vehicle driver, whereby an automatic traffic separation is carried out in which the position and speed of objects and traffic users are detected by a separation sensor. The vehicle is then subjected to a braking or acceleration, depending on said detected information. According to the invention, other information relating to the road layout from a navigation system or other data-bank containing road layout data is accessed, such that when the above information indicates that a detected traffic user under normal conditions is expected to merge into the lane of the road vehicle comprising said system, the driving properties of said road vehicle are matched to those of the detected traffic user.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application is a national stage of PCT/EP2004/012057 filed Oct. 26, 2004, and based upon DE 103 58 034.4 filed on Dec. 11, 2003 under the International Convention.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The invention concerns a process for adapting the distance control for automatic safe following in motor vehicles to traffic users merging into their lane, as well as a device suitable for carrying out the process.
  • For increasing the safety and the driving comfort in the guidance of motor vehicles in traffic, these are today increasingly equipped with automatic systems for vehicle following control or safe separation control, by means of which the vehicle automatically maintains a safe separation from a preceding motor vehicle.
  • 2. Description of Related Art
  • An example of a device of this general type is described in European Laid Open Publication EP0605104A1, which device includes a distance sensor, an evaluation unit and an adjustable speed influencing servo device which is under the control of control parameters calculated by the evaluation unit. The distance sensor is, for a example, a millimeter wavelength radar, a lidar or an ultrasound sensor and senses the environment ahead of the road vehicle in order to detect objects or traffic users located therein. The sensor angle is therein generally selected such that objects on adjacent lanes can also be detected. The environment data detected by the distance sensor is transmitted to the evaluation unit, so that, having knowledge of the speed of the equipped vehicle, the speed of the other detected traffic users can be arrived at. Starting with a safe distance to be maintained, which is generally selected depending upon the speed, a speed-dependent following time tf is computed. If the equipped vehicle has a higher speed than a recognized preceding traffic user in the same lane, then the following time tf continuously decreases. If this decrease reaches a preset threshold, then the evaluation unit produces a control parameter or signal which acts on the speed governing servo device in such a manner that the speed of the equipped vehicle is reduced. The distinction as to whether an object or a traffic user is located in the same lane or an adjacent lane occurs herein on the basis of a defined lane breadth. Besides the observation of traffic users in the lane being driven by the equipped vehicle, the evaluation unit determines, using the data from the distance sensor, also the direction of movement of the traffic users in adjacent lanes. If the traffic user moves from an adjacent lane into the defined lane breadth, then the evaluation unit evaluates this traffic user as closest traffic user and controls the speed of the equipped vehicle to be so far below it that the following time tf is maintained with respect to this traffic user. This control operation however, in particular in “pincers” movements (hazards closing in from both sides of the equipped vehicle), frequently leads to an abrupt reduction in the speed of the equipped vehicle, since traffic users changing into lane of other traffic frequently leave only a very small spacing between vehicles following behind them in their lane.
  • In order to attenuate or cushion this type of abrupt speed change, it is proposed in German Laid Open Publication DE10160189A1, to design the rules of behavior of the system for automatic following guidance in such a manner that upon detecting a traffic user in the vicinity of a road merger or junction it takes note of this fact and in connection therewith recognizes that the ahead lying road area approaches the own lane. Subsequently an increased alertness of the area detected by the distance sensor is observed for merging vehicles. On the basis of the recognition that a potential merging vehicle is located in the immediate vicinity, it can be more rapidly and reliably detected already in the first detection cycle in which it is recognized by the distance sensor and identified as such. In this manner a relevant merging vehicle can already be recognized very early, so that more time remains for adjusting the following time tf and as a result the speed of the equipped vehicle is reduced less abruptly.
  • For increasing the time necessary for adjusting the following time tf and for creating a more comfortable following guidance conforming more closely to the human driving behavior of a vehicle, it is proposed in German Patent DE198 04 944C2 to detect the transverse acceleration of a traffic user located in the adjacent lane and approaching the lane of the equipped vehicle. If herein a transverse speed of a traffic user located in an adjacent lane towards the equipped vehicle is detected, then a conclusion is drawn as to an imminent merging. Accordingly, here also the environment area observed by the distance sensor is widened, in order to better observe this merging vehicle. Since, as a result of the evaluation of the transverse speed, a merging of a traffic user can be recognized on the basis of its change in position already prior to the merging thereof into the lane of the distance regulated vehicle, the control process can be improved and be adapted to the driving behavior of a human motor vehicle operator. In situations in which the merging traffic user however undertakes a relatively rapid lane change, it could also happen that, in the vehicle safe distance guidance described in DE19804944C2, an abrupt speed change of the vehicle could not be avoided.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The task of the invention is thus to provide a process for adaptation of an automatic safe following distance guidance of a vehicle (10) to a traffic user merging into ones own lane (B), as well as a device suitable for carrying out this process, which avoids abrupt speed changes of the vehicle in the adjustment of the following time to the traffic user and to imitate the driving behavior of a human motor vehicle operator.
  • This task is solved by a process and by a device suitable for carrying out the process. Advantageous embodiments and further developments of the invention are described in the dependent claims.
  • In this new process for adaptation of an automatic following guidance of a road vehicle (10) to a traffic user (20) merging into ones own lane (B), objects and traffic users (20) ahead of their own vehicle are detected within a detection area (12) originating from a separation sensor. Subsequently in an evaluation unit the position and speeds of the detected objects and traffic users (20) are determined, in order to, beginning with this computed data, to produce controlled parameters in order to specifically act on servo means for acceleration or deceleration of the vehicle. In inventive manner, for this in the generation of the controlled parameters supplementally taken into consideration, besides the data regarding the object and the traffic users (20) ascertained in the evaluation unit also information from a navigation system describing the course of the road ahead or a data bank containing information regarding the course of the road is accessed. In the case that it is determined that, from the information regarding the further course of the road, that at least on of the detected traffic users in normal driving behavior would change to the lane (B) of the vehicle (10), the controlled parameters for the servo means acting on the vehicle (10) are produced in such a manner, that the driving behavior of the road vehicle (10) adapts to the at least one detected traffic user (20) depending upon its vehicle speed and/or position. Included in the typical information regarding the further course of the road, from which it can be determined, that a traffic user detected therein in the normal vehicle behavior would change to the lane (B) of the vehicle, there belong in particular information regarding junctions, highway on ramps or reduction in available lanes; for example the narrowing of a three lane highway to a two lane highway, in which the vehicles located on the lane which ends must merge into an adjacent lane.
  • The invention therewith which makes it possible, from recognition of the own vehicle position and with reference to supplemental additional information describing the course of the road in a mode and manner looking to the future to already early so adjust the speed of the vehicle that for a potential merging traffic already early place has been provided, which leads to a significantly more harmonious driving behavior. In this advantageous manner the operator of the motor vehicle has the feeling that the system drives by looking ahead in the manner of an ideal human driving behavior.
  • In the frame work of the invention for the production of object data from the environment of the inventive system including the motor vehicle all types of separation sensors known from the state of the art can be employed, in particular advantageously millimeter waive length radars, lidars or distance resolving camera systems. In particularly advantageously manner information describing the ahead lying course of the street from the ADAS (Map Advanced Driver Assistance System) can be read, which besides the information necessary for vehicle navigation also includes supplemental information regarding the number of lanes (AB) and/or marking with respect to on and off ramps (C) on highways or major streets. From this type of map material, as well as from knowing the position of the vehicle it is possible using the ADAS-Maps relatively precisely to determine for example the position of on ramps, sense their locational positioning is relatively precise. If in the course of the street lying ahead of the own vehicle for example an on ramp is recognized and if in this on ramp a traffic user is recognized, it can be assumed, that this will merge accordingly to conventional driving behavior from the on ramp onto the thereto adjacent lane. If the on vehicle is located on this adjacent lane, then it can already, in contrast to the systems known from the state of the art, already before the recognized traffic user even has begun the merging process, by suitable adjustment of the servo parameters the on vehicle can be controlled or regulated in such a manner in its speed that for the ahead line merging of the other traffic user space can be made available.
  • If on the other hand it is recognized from the information from the navigation system describing the ahead line course of the road or from another data bank (for example the ADAS-Map) that an on ramp leads to an additional lane running parallel to the previous lane, then the evaluation unit does not exert influence by the production of servo or controlled parameters on the speed of the own vehicle. The progression guidance does not react in this type of this situation to the recognized traffic user, since in the case of a conventional mode of driving the traffic user it is not reliably recognized that the traffic user will carry out a lane change; in such a situation the human driver of the own vehicle will also not react to this traffic user with a change of the vehicle speed, rather he would maintain the vehicle speed and only carefully observe the driving behavior of the other traffic user.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Of course the functionality of the invention is not limited to the forward looking recognition of merging behavior on on-ramps, but can rather for example in the same manner also be employed advantageously in situations in which in the ahead lying course of the road the number of drivable lanes is reduced and wherein the traffic users located on the disappearing lane must merge to the remaining lanes.
  • In the following the invention will be described in greater detail on the basis of illustrative examples and with aide of the figures.
  • FIG. 1. Shows a merging situation on an on ramp on a multi-lane road.
  • FIG. 2. Shows the scene corresponding to FIG. 1, in which vehicles involved in the merging process are located at other positions.
  • FIG. 3. Likewise shows the scene corresponding to FIG. 1 or 2, in which the vehicles involved in the merging process are again located at other positions.
  • FIG. 4. Likewise shows a scene corresponding to FIGS. 1, 2 or 3, in which the merging vehicles are located in the dead zone area of the merging vehicle.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • A typical merging situation on an on ramp of a multi-lane road is illustrated in FIG. 1. For this a vehicle 10 moves along a multi-lane road with lanes A and B on lane B in the direction of the directional arrow 11. The C corresponds to an on and off ramp onto the roadway with the lanes A and B. The vehicle 10 is equipped with an inventive system for recognition of merging vehicles, wherein the limitations of a for example sensing or detection range of the separate sensor included in the system is indicated by dashed lines 12. In the examples shown in FIGS. 1 through 4 the sensing area of the separation sensor is so arranged that it overlaps wide areas of lanes A, B, and C. A vehicle 20 is moving along lane C, which is located in the sensing area 12 of the separation sensor and therewith is detected by the inventive system. Based on the assumption of a typical driving behavior it is then to be presumed, that the vehicle 20 will change from lane C to lane B along a trajectory 21 a or 21 b or 21 c (or a similar trajectory). Whatever the possible trajectory is selected by the driver of the vehicle in the course of his change or merging process is selected cannot be predicted in a situation as illustrated in FIG. 1, since the vehicle is still driving straight ahead and therewith no significant transverse movement can be measured. By means of the evaluation of the sensor data of the separation sensor however the relative speed of the vehicle 20 can be measured in reference to the own vehicle 10.
  • In order to allow vehicle 20 a optimal, interference free merger process it is possible in advantageous manner in those cases, in which the speed of the at least one detected traffic user 20 exceeds the own speed of the vehicle 10, to so adapt the driving behavior of the own vehicle 10 to that of the traffic user 20, that by a suitable adjusting of the servo parameter the speed of the own vehicle 10 is reduced to the realm of the speed of the traffic user 20. (In the case of the speed of the detected traffic user 20 is exceeded by the own. speed of the own vehicle 10). In this manner, the distance between the two vehicles remains essentially constant, so that the driver of the 10 does not experience an uncomfortable approaching to the vehicle 20, and also the operator of the vehicle 20 is implicitly telegraphed the possibility of a safe merger.
  • In order to optimize the driving behavior of the vehicle 10 in its breaking behavior, the relative speed of the vehicle 20 relative to vehicle to 10 should be taken into consideration in determining the servo parameters for the vehicle brake system. Therein it is advantageous when the separation of the own vehicle 10 to the at least one detected traffic user 20 is so large, that the reduction and speed of the own vehicle 10 occurs with moderation. Here the operator of the own vehicle 10 is not disturbed by oscillations in distance between the vehicles or a moderate approaching of the own vehicle to the other vehicle 20 and corresponds essentially to his own natural driving behavior. In those cases, as shown for example in FIG. 2, in which the distance of the owned vehicle 10 is relatively small to the at least on detected traffic user 20 and wherein he in accordance with a conventional driving behavior would quickly carry out a change in lane maneuver, the reduction and speed of the own vehicle 10 can advantageously occur rapidly. In the here shown example the other vehicle 20 is located close to the end of the on ramp, so that, in accordance with conventional driving behavior, it can be presumed, that the merging maneuver from lane C to lane B would occur very soon along trajectory 22. Alternatively to a rapid dropping of the vehicle speed of the own vehicle 10 this could in advantageous manner also be so controlled, that a change in lane to an adjacent, away from the detected traffic user 20 (here: lane A) is carried out along for example trajectory 13. Such a behavior, the avoidance of danger, corresponds to the natural behavior of the vehicle operator and is thus not found to be a cause of concern by him.
  • If this type of change in lane occurs completely automatically, it should be insured, that prior to the change in lane to the lane opposite to the traffic user 20, the adjacent lane A, is checked for avoidance of accidents by means of a sensor system for monitoring adjacent lanes a blind angle monitoring system, it is checked with regard to whether a free of danger change of the own vehicle 10 to lane A is possible.
  • The result of a checking and monitoring of this type of the occupancy condition of a possible evasion lane can lead to a decision regarding suitable means for reaction to a eminent merging vehicle 20; that is it can be decided whether the operator of the vehicle 10 would prefer a rapid breaking of his own vehicle or whether a deviation to lane A would be considered more natural and comfortable.
  • In FIG. 3. a traffic situation is illustrated, in which the separation of the own vehicle 10 to the at least one traffic user 20 in the detection area 12 is relatively small, it however in accordance with the conventional driving behavior still has time remaining for a lane change, the speed of the own vehicle 10 is not reduced since vehicle 10 moves in general substantially faster than the other vehicle 20 it will speedily over take this, so that the operator of the other vehicle 20 can merge behind 10 onto lane B without problem. In an advantageous manner it is however also conceivable, in a situation of this type to moderately increase the speed of the own vehicle 10, if the traffic situation or the traffic regulations or a setting of the cruise control system (Tempomat, Distronic) permit this. In this manner on the one hand the own vehicle 10 distances itself substantially more rapidly from the potential dangerous situation and on the other hand the operator of the other vehicle 20 is given more time for merging, since the lane B is more rapidly opened. If vehicle 10 however is accelerated in advantageous manner the speed thereof should, after passing the other traffic user 20 can be reduced to the speed at which it operated prior to over taking. By this return controlling of the speed the vehicle 10 continues, despite the merger maneuver of an another vehicle on to his lane, continues on its way with the accustomed behavior.
  • FIG. 4 shows a further merger situation of an on ramp. Herein the own vehicle 10 moves along a multi-lane highway with lanes A and B along lane B in the direction of the indicating 11. On the same lane A there is supplementally a vehicle in traffic 30, which moves in the direction of the indicating arrow 31. A further vehicle 20 moves along lane C, this is however located in the blind area of the own vehicle 10 and is detected by a blind angle monitoring system integrated in the own vehicle 10. Under the assumption that the other vehicle 20 is moving faster than the own vehicle 10, it is to be presumed, that the other vehicle 20 will change lane from C to lane B along the trajectory 24 or similar trajectory between the vehicles 10, 30. In the case that the distance between the vehicles 10, 30 is large or that no preceding vehicle 30 is present, a moderate reduction of the speed of the own vehicle 10 suffices, so that the other vehicle 20 can merge with a safe distance ahead of the own vehicle 10. A substantial reduction is herein brought about thereby, in that for a short time no gas is given. In a case that the vehicles 10, 30, move along with approximately the same speed and follow close to each other, space must be provided for the merger of vehicle 20. The in case it is determined from the view of the vehicle 10 by means of a blind angle monitoring system that no vehicular traffic is located on lane A, it can be presumed, that the vehicle 20 immediately after merging on to lane B will continue changing lane to lane A, so that a stronger engagement of breaks can be extended for a short period of time in vehicle 10. In contrast, in the case that the adjacent lane A is already occupied a stronger actuation of the breaks is brought about in vehicle 10 without delay.
  • In particularly advantageous manner the inventive process and the inventive device allow themselves to be used to merge from a lane traveled by a vehicle 10 containing the invention to an adjacent lane, upon which other traffic users are located. Herein it is in particular with access to the environment information from the adjacent street areas decided whether the vehicle 10 should merge ahead of or after in particular traffic user traveling there. Depending upon this decision one sets the speed of the own vehicle either above or below the speed of the concerned vehicle participant by suitable selection of the adjustment parameter for the servo means for acceleration or breaking of the own vehicle, so that a safe merger procedure representing a far-sided manner of driving is safely carried out to the adjacent lane.

Claims (16)

1. A process for adapting and automated safe distance following guidance of an equipped vehicle (10) to a traffic user (20) merging into the lane (B) of the equipped vehicle (10), comprising:
detecting objects and traffic users (20) ahead of the own vehicle within a sensed area (12) originating from a spacing sensor, and
determining, in an evaluation unit, the positions and speeds of the detected objects and traffic users (20), in order to produce, beginning from this computed data, control parameters in order to selectively influence servo means for acceleration or braking of the equipped vehicle,
wherein in the production of the control parameters, in addition to the data of the objects and traffic users (20) determined in the evaluation unit, also information from a navigation system or another data bank describing the ahead-lying layout of the road is accessed,
and wherein, when from the information regarding the additional layout of the road, it is determined that at least one traffic user exercising conventional driving behavior will change lane to the lane (B) of the equipped vehicle (10), the control parameters for the servo means acting upon the own vehicle (10) are produced in such a manner, that the behavior of the own vehicle (10) is adapted to the at least one detected traffic user (20) according to its speed and/or position.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein the detection of objects and traffic users (20) occurs by the spacing sensor using millimeter waive length radar, lidar or camera sensors.
3. A process according to claim 1, wherein information describing the ahead lying layout of the road is read from ADAS-Map (Advanced Driver Assistance System), which information includes, in addition to information necessary for vehicle navigation, also supplementally information regarding the number of lanes (A), (B) and/or markers with respect to on ramps and off ramps (C) to highways or major roads.
4. A process according to claim 1, wherein in the cases in which the speed of the at least one detected traffic user (20) is exceeded by the speed of the equipped vehicle (10), the driving behavior of the equipped vehicle is adapted in such a manner to the traffic user (20) that, by suitable adjusting of the controlled parameters, the speed of the own vehicle is reduced to the realm of the speed of the traffic user (20).
5. A process according to claim 4, wherein in those cases in which the spacing of the equipped vehicle (10) to the at least one detected traffic participant (20) is large, the reduction in speed of the equipped vehicle (10) occurs with moderation.
6. A process according to claim 4, wherein in the cases in which the separation of the own vehicle (10) to the at least one detected traffic user (20) is relatively small, the traffic user (20) however following conventional driving behavior would be expected to immediately carry out a lane change, the reduction in the speed of the own vehicle (10) occurs rapidly.
7. A process according to claim 4, wherein in the cases, in which the separation of the own vehicle (10) to the at least one detected traffic user (20) is relatively small, the traffic user (20) however following conventional driving behavior would be expected to immediately carry out a lane change, the equipped vehicle (10) is programmed to carry out a lane change to an adjacent lane (A) opposite to the detected traffic user (20).
8. A process according to claim 7, wherein prior to the lane change to adjacent lane (A) opposite to the detected traffic user (20), this lane (A) is examined with a sensor system for monitoring adjacent lanes, in particular a blind angle monitoring system, with regarding to whether a safe change in lane of the equipped vehicle (10) to this lane (A) is possible.
9. A process according to claim 4, wherein in the cases, in which the distance of the equipped vehicle (10) to the at least one detected traffic user (20) is relatively small, yet still sufficient to allow time for a lane change in conventional driving behavior, the speed of the own vehicle (10) is not reduced.
10. A process according to claim 9, wherein, traffic situations and regulations permitting, the speed of the equipped vehicle (10) is moderately increased.
11. A process according to claim 10, wherein the speed of the equipped vehicle (10), after passing the at least one detected traffic user (20), is again reduced to resume the speed prior to the increasing of the speed.
12. A device for adapting an automatic safe following guidance of an equipped vehicle (10) to traffic users (20) merging to this lane (B),
including a spacing sensor for detecting objects and traffic users (20) located ahead of the equipped vehicle (10),
further including an evaluation unit for determining the position and relative speed of the detected objects and traffic users (20), and
a means for acting, beginning with the determined position and speed, on a servo means for accelerating or braking the equipped vehicle (10),
wherein the device is in communication with a navigation system or another data bank, in order to access additional information describing the layout of the road for producing control parameters, in addition to the evaluation unit determined data of the object and the traffic users (20).
13. A device according to claim 12, wherein the spacing sensor is a millimeter waive length radar, lidar or camera sensor.
14. A device according to claim 12, wherein the data bank, from which supplemental information describing the ahead lying layout of the road is read, includes an ADAS-Map.
15. A device according to claim 12, wherein the device is in communication with a sensor system for monitoring an adjacent lane, in particular a blind angle monitoring system, in order, prior to a change in lane of the equipped vehicle (10) to a adjacent lane (A) opposite to the detected traffic user (20), this adjacent lane is examined to the extent as to whether a safe change in that direction is possible.
16. A process as in claim 1, wherein for merging in to the lane travelled by the equipped vehicle (10) by vehicles from a lane adjacent, in which other traffic users are located,
for preparing for the merging, depending upon whether the vehicle is to merge ahead of or behind a particular traffic user, the speed of the equipped vehicle is either increased above or reduced below the speed of the particular traffic user by appropriate selection of the control parameters, using the servo means for acceleration or braking of the own vehicle.
US10/582,286 2003-12-11 2004-10-26 Adaptation of an automatic distance control to traffic users potentially merging into the lane thereof Abandoned US20070142995A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10358034.4 2003-12-11
DE10358034A DE10358034A1 (en) 2003-12-11 2003-12-11 Adaptation of an automatic follow-up to potential road users shunting their own lane
PCT/EP2004/012057 WO2005061265A1 (en) 2003-12-11 2004-10-26 Adaptation of an automatic distance control to traffic users potentially merging into the lane thereof

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070142995A1 true US20070142995A1 (en) 2007-06-21

Family

ID=34672606

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/582,286 Abandoned US20070142995A1 (en) 2003-12-11 2004-10-26 Adaptation of an automatic distance control to traffic users potentially merging into the lane thereof

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20070142995A1 (en)
DE (1) DE10358034A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2005061265A1 (en)

Cited By (49)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090204304A1 (en) * 2005-08-01 2009-08-13 Werner Urban Method for recognizing a turn maneuver and driver assistance system for motor vehicles
US20090326752A1 (en) * 2005-08-18 2009-12-31 Martin Staempfle Method for detecting a traffic zone
US20100332127A1 (en) * 2009-06-30 2010-12-30 Clarion Co., Ltd. Lane Judgement Equipment and Navigation System
CN103754224A (en) * 2014-01-24 2014-04-30 清华大学 Vehicle multi-target coordinating lane changing assisting adaptive cruise control method
JP2014123283A (en) * 2012-12-21 2014-07-03 Nippon Soken Inc Travel route generating device
US20140236464A1 (en) * 2010-11-14 2014-08-21 Pelmorex Canada Inc. Crowd sourced traffic reporting
EP2791930A1 (en) * 2011-12-14 2014-10-22 Robert Bosch GmbH Vehicle merge assistance system and method
US9026300B2 (en) 2012-11-06 2015-05-05 Google Inc. Methods and systems to aid autonomous vehicles driving through a lane merge
JP2015102893A (en) * 2013-11-21 2015-06-04 日産自動車株式会社 Merging support system
US20160101778A1 (en) * 2013-05-13 2016-04-14 Robert Bosch Gmbh method and device for operating a vehicle
JP2016110406A (en) * 2014-12-05 2016-06-20 本田技研工業株式会社 Traveling assist system
US9390620B2 (en) 2011-05-18 2016-07-12 Pelmorex Canada Inc. System for providing traffic data and driving efficiency data
US9401088B2 (en) 2002-03-05 2016-07-26 Pelmorex Canada Inc. Method for predicting a travel time for a traffic route
US9448690B2 (en) 2009-03-04 2016-09-20 Pelmorex Canada Inc. Controlling a three-dimensional virtual broadcast presentation
JP2016533289A (en) * 2013-10-03 2016-10-27 ローベルト ボッシュ ゲゼルシャフト ミット ベシュレンクテル ハフツング Adaptive cruise control with on-ramp detection
JP2016207015A (en) * 2015-04-24 2016-12-08 日産自動車株式会社 Travel control device
US9644982B2 (en) 2003-07-25 2017-05-09 Pelmorex Canada Inc. System and method for delivering departure notifications
US20180122244A1 (en) * 2016-11-02 2018-05-03 HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA Method, system, and computer program product for detecting a possible lane change of a fellow vehicle, also a vehicle
JP2018076004A (en) * 2016-11-10 2018-05-17 パナソニック株式会社 Vehicle control method and vehicle control device
US10037696B2 (en) * 2016-03-31 2018-07-31 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Cooperative automated vehicle system
EP3330942A4 (en) * 2015-07-28 2018-08-08 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Method for controlling travel control device, and travel control device
US10059345B2 (en) * 2013-10-15 2018-08-28 Continental Automotive Gmbh Method for operating a motor vehicle and motor vehicle for carrying out the method
US10081357B2 (en) 2016-06-23 2018-09-25 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Vehicular communications network and methods of use and manufacture thereof
US10126136B2 (en) 2016-06-14 2018-11-13 nuTonomy Inc. Route planning for an autonomous vehicle
US10134282B2 (en) 2012-02-23 2018-11-20 Denso Corporation On-vehicle tracking control apparatus
JP2018197962A (en) * 2017-05-24 2018-12-13 マツダ株式会社 Vehicle merge supporting device
US10223909B2 (en) 2012-10-18 2019-03-05 Uber Technologies, Inc. Estimating time travel distributions on signalized arterials
US20190071082A1 (en) * 2017-09-05 2019-03-07 Aptiv Technologies Limited Automated speed control system
US10286913B2 (en) 2016-06-23 2019-05-14 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for merge assist using vehicular communication
US10309792B2 (en) 2016-06-14 2019-06-04 nuTonomy Inc. Route planning for an autonomous vehicle
US10332403B2 (en) 2017-01-04 2019-06-25 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for vehicle congestion estimation
US10331129B2 (en) 2016-10-20 2019-06-25 nuTonomy Inc. Identifying a stopping place for an autonomous vehicle
US20190212734A1 (en) * 2016-05-04 2019-07-11 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Automated Vehicle Operating System With Driving-Rule Modification Based on Observation of Another Vehicle
US10449962B2 (en) 2016-06-23 2019-10-22 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for vehicle control using vehicular communication
US10473470B2 (en) 2016-10-20 2019-11-12 nuTonomy Inc. Identifying a stopping place for an autonomous vehicle
US10625742B2 (en) 2016-06-23 2020-04-21 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for vehicle control in tailgating situations
US10681513B2 (en) 2016-10-20 2020-06-09 nuTonomy Inc. Identifying a stopping place for an autonomous vehicle
US10737667B2 (en) 2016-06-23 2020-08-11 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for vehicle control in tailgating situations
EP3695666A4 (en) * 2017-10-12 2020-11-25 Netradyne, Inc. Detection of driving actions that mitigate risk
US10857994B2 (en) 2016-10-20 2020-12-08 Motional Ad Llc Identifying a stopping place for an autonomous vehicle
CN112061121A (en) * 2019-05-21 2020-12-11 铃木株式会社 Vehicle travel control device
CN113002544A (en) * 2021-04-13 2021-06-22 知行汽车科技(苏州)有限公司 Ramp afflux point track planning method
US11092446B2 (en) 2016-06-14 2021-08-17 Motional Ad Llc Route planning for an autonomous vehicle
JP2021155030A (en) * 2020-03-25 2021-10-07 本田技研工業株式会社 Vehicle control device, vehicle, vehicle control method and program
US11192555B2 (en) * 2018-12-10 2021-12-07 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Vehicle controller
US20220063627A1 (en) * 2020-08-31 2022-03-03 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Traveling lane planning device, storage medium storing computer program for traveling lane planning, and traveling lane planning method
US20220208004A1 (en) * 2018-07-13 2022-06-30 Nec Corporation Driving support apparatus, driving support method, and computer-readable recording medium
US20220250623A1 (en) * 2021-02-08 2022-08-11 Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. Merging support device, merging support system, merging support method, and computer-readable medium
US11590979B2 (en) 2020-03-25 2023-02-28 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Vehicle control device, vehicle, vehicle control method, and storage medium

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4613906B2 (en) * 2006-12-14 2011-01-19 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Vehicle periphery monitoring device
DE102012214208A1 (en) 2012-08-09 2014-02-13 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Method for operating a motor vehicle during a fully automatic vehicle guidance
JP6413240B2 (en) * 2014-01-08 2018-10-31 株式会社デンソー Vehicle control device and vehicle
DE102016009764A1 (en) * 2016-08-11 2018-02-15 Trw Automotive Gmbh A control system and method of controlling a motor vehicle along a path and avoiding a collision with another motor vehicle
DE102017220648A1 (en) * 2017-11-20 2019-05-23 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Speed control system and method for situation-specific changing a distance of the motor vehicle to a target object
US10725475B2 (en) * 2018-04-09 2020-07-28 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Machine learning enhanced vehicle merging

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6198993B1 (en) * 1997-08-22 2001-03-06 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Running vehicle control method for automatically controlling a plurality of vehicles running on a road
US6805216B2 (en) * 2000-06-20 2004-10-19 Daimlerchrysler Ag Method for regulating the distance between a vehicle and another vehicle traveling ahead and a distance-regulating system

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB9226930D0 (en) * 1992-12-24 1993-02-17 Jaguar Cars Cruise control systems for motor vehicles
JPH08263793A (en) * 1995-03-23 1996-10-11 Honda Motor Co Ltd Vehicle controller
DE19728591A1 (en) * 1997-07-04 1999-01-21 Audi Ag Method for determining the driving behavior of a vehicle in front
DE19804944C2 (en) * 1998-02-07 2000-04-20 Volkswagen Ag Automatic distance control method for motor vehicles
JP3658519B2 (en) * 1999-06-28 2005-06-08 株式会社日立製作所 Vehicle control system and vehicle control device
DE19951423A1 (en) * 1999-10-26 2001-05-03 Wabco Gmbh & Co Ohg Automatic distance control method for vehicles
DE10242220A1 (en) * 2002-09-12 2004-03-25 Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh Motor vehicle lane change warning system, comprises a blind angle area-monitoring unit that generates a warning to a driver if another vehicle or obstacle is in the blind angle area

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6198993B1 (en) * 1997-08-22 2001-03-06 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Running vehicle control method for automatically controlling a plurality of vehicles running on a road
US6805216B2 (en) * 2000-06-20 2004-10-19 Daimlerchrysler Ag Method for regulating the distance between a vehicle and another vehicle traveling ahead and a distance-regulating system

Cited By (73)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9401088B2 (en) 2002-03-05 2016-07-26 Pelmorex Canada Inc. Method for predicting a travel time for a traffic route
US9640073B2 (en) 2002-03-05 2017-05-02 Pelmorex Canada Inc. Generating visual information associated with traffic
US9602977B2 (en) 2002-03-05 2017-03-21 Pelmorex Canada Inc. GPS generated traffic information
US9489842B2 (en) 2002-03-05 2016-11-08 Pelmorex Canada Inc. Method for choosing a traffic route
US9644982B2 (en) 2003-07-25 2017-05-09 Pelmorex Canada Inc. System and method for delivering departure notifications
US20090204304A1 (en) * 2005-08-01 2009-08-13 Werner Urban Method for recognizing a turn maneuver and driver assistance system for motor vehicles
US8131444B2 (en) 2005-08-01 2012-03-06 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for recognizing a turn maneuver and driver assistance system for motor vehicles
US20090326752A1 (en) * 2005-08-18 2009-12-31 Martin Staempfle Method for detecting a traffic zone
US8818694B2 (en) * 2005-08-18 2014-08-26 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for detecting a traffic zone
US9448690B2 (en) 2009-03-04 2016-09-20 Pelmorex Canada Inc. Controlling a three-dimensional virtual broadcast presentation
US10289264B2 (en) 2009-03-04 2019-05-14 Uber Technologies, Inc. Controlling a three-dimensional virtual broadcast presentation
US20100332127A1 (en) * 2009-06-30 2010-12-30 Clarion Co., Ltd. Lane Judgement Equipment and Navigation System
EP2269883A1 (en) * 2009-06-30 2011-01-05 Clarion Co., Ltd. Lane judgement equipment and navigation system
US20140236464A1 (en) * 2010-11-14 2014-08-21 Pelmorex Canada Inc. Crowd sourced traffic reporting
US9390620B2 (en) 2011-05-18 2016-07-12 Pelmorex Canada Inc. System for providing traffic data and driving efficiency data
US9547984B2 (en) 2011-05-18 2017-01-17 Pelmorex Canada Inc. System for providing traffic data and driving efficiency data
EP2791930A1 (en) * 2011-12-14 2014-10-22 Robert Bosch GmbH Vehicle merge assistance system and method
EP3726500A1 (en) * 2011-12-14 2020-10-21 Robert Bosch GmbH Vehicle merge assistance system and method
US10134282B2 (en) 2012-02-23 2018-11-20 Denso Corporation On-vehicle tracking control apparatus
US10223909B2 (en) 2012-10-18 2019-03-05 Uber Technologies, Inc. Estimating time travel distributions on signalized arterials
US10971000B2 (en) 2012-10-18 2021-04-06 Uber Technologies, Inc. Estimating time travel distributions on signalized arterials
US9026300B2 (en) 2012-11-06 2015-05-05 Google Inc. Methods and systems to aid autonomous vehicles driving through a lane merge
JP2014123283A (en) * 2012-12-21 2014-07-03 Nippon Soken Inc Travel route generating device
US20160101778A1 (en) * 2013-05-13 2016-04-14 Robert Bosch Gmbh method and device for operating a vehicle
US9738280B2 (en) * 2013-10-03 2017-08-22 Robert Bosch Gmbh Adaptive cruise control with on-ramp detection
JP2016533289A (en) * 2013-10-03 2016-10-27 ローベルト ボッシュ ゲゼルシャフト ミット ベシュレンクテル ハフツング Adaptive cruise control with on-ramp detection
US10059345B2 (en) * 2013-10-15 2018-08-28 Continental Automotive Gmbh Method for operating a motor vehicle and motor vehicle for carrying out the method
JP2015102893A (en) * 2013-11-21 2015-06-04 日産自動車株式会社 Merging support system
CN103754224A (en) * 2014-01-24 2014-04-30 清华大学 Vehicle multi-target coordinating lane changing assisting adaptive cruise control method
JP2016110406A (en) * 2014-12-05 2016-06-20 本田技研工業株式会社 Traveling assist system
JP2016207015A (en) * 2015-04-24 2016-12-08 日産自動車株式会社 Travel control device
EP3330942A4 (en) * 2015-07-28 2018-08-08 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Method for controlling travel control device, and travel control device
US10037696B2 (en) * 2016-03-31 2018-07-31 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Cooperative automated vehicle system
US11067984B2 (en) * 2016-05-04 2021-07-20 Motional Ad Llc Automated vehicle operating system with driving-rule modification based on observation of another vehicle
US20190212734A1 (en) * 2016-05-04 2019-07-11 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Automated Vehicle Operating System With Driving-Rule Modification Based on Observation of Another Vehicle
US11022450B2 (en) 2016-06-14 2021-06-01 Motional Ad Llc Route planning for an autonomous vehicle
US10309792B2 (en) 2016-06-14 2019-06-04 nuTonomy Inc. Route planning for an autonomous vehicle
US11092446B2 (en) 2016-06-14 2021-08-17 Motional Ad Llc Route planning for an autonomous vehicle
US10126136B2 (en) 2016-06-14 2018-11-13 nuTonomy Inc. Route planning for an autonomous vehicle
US11022449B2 (en) 2016-06-14 2021-06-01 Motional Ad Llc Route planning for an autonomous vehicle
US11312378B2 (en) 2016-06-23 2022-04-26 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for vehicle control using vehicular communication
US11161503B2 (en) 2016-06-23 2021-11-02 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Vehicular communications network and methods of use and manufacture thereof
US11338813B2 (en) 2016-06-23 2022-05-24 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for merge assist using vehicular communication
US10286913B2 (en) 2016-06-23 2019-05-14 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for merge assist using vehicular communication
US10449962B2 (en) 2016-06-23 2019-10-22 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for vehicle control using vehicular communication
US10081357B2 (en) 2016-06-23 2018-09-25 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Vehicular communications network and methods of use and manufacture thereof
US10625742B2 (en) 2016-06-23 2020-04-21 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for vehicle control in tailgating situations
US10737667B2 (en) 2016-06-23 2020-08-11 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for vehicle control in tailgating situations
US10681513B2 (en) 2016-10-20 2020-06-09 nuTonomy Inc. Identifying a stopping place for an autonomous vehicle
US10473470B2 (en) 2016-10-20 2019-11-12 nuTonomy Inc. Identifying a stopping place for an autonomous vehicle
US10331129B2 (en) 2016-10-20 2019-06-25 nuTonomy Inc. Identifying a stopping place for an autonomous vehicle
US11711681B2 (en) 2016-10-20 2023-07-25 Motional Ad Llc Identifying a stopping place for an autonomous vehicle
US10857994B2 (en) 2016-10-20 2020-12-08 Motional Ad Llc Identifying a stopping place for an autonomous vehicle
US20180122244A1 (en) * 2016-11-02 2018-05-03 HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA Method, system, and computer program product for detecting a possible lane change of a fellow vehicle, also a vehicle
US10192446B2 (en) * 2016-11-02 2019-01-29 HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA Method, system, and computer program product for detecting a possible lane change of a fellow vehicle, also a vehicle
CN108001450A (en) * 2016-11-02 2018-05-08 黑拉许克联合股份有限公司 For identifying method, system and the computer program product and vehicle of possible lane change
JP2018076004A (en) * 2016-11-10 2018-05-17 パナソニック株式会社 Vehicle control method and vehicle control device
US10332403B2 (en) 2017-01-04 2019-06-25 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for vehicle congestion estimation
JP2018197962A (en) * 2017-05-24 2018-12-13 マツダ株式会社 Vehicle merge supporting device
US20190071082A1 (en) * 2017-09-05 2019-03-07 Aptiv Technologies Limited Automated speed control system
US10850732B2 (en) * 2017-09-05 2020-12-01 Aptiv Technologies Limited Automated speed control system
US11639174B2 (en) 2017-09-05 2023-05-02 Aptiv Technologies Limited Automated speed control system
EP3695666A4 (en) * 2017-10-12 2020-11-25 Netradyne, Inc. Detection of driving actions that mitigate risk
US20220208004A1 (en) * 2018-07-13 2022-06-30 Nec Corporation Driving support apparatus, driving support method, and computer-readable recording medium
US11192555B2 (en) * 2018-12-10 2021-12-07 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Vehicle controller
CN112061121A (en) * 2019-05-21 2020-12-11 铃木株式会社 Vehicle travel control device
US11590979B2 (en) 2020-03-25 2023-02-28 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Vehicle control device, vehicle, vehicle control method, and storage medium
JP7245859B2 (en) 2020-03-25 2023-03-24 本田技研工業株式会社 VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE, VEHICLE, VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD AND PROGRAM
JP2021155030A (en) * 2020-03-25 2021-10-07 本田技研工業株式会社 Vehicle control device, vehicle, vehicle control method and program
US20220063627A1 (en) * 2020-08-31 2022-03-03 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Traveling lane planning device, storage medium storing computer program for traveling lane planning, and traveling lane planning method
US11834047B2 (en) * 2020-08-31 2023-12-05 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Traveling lane planning device, storage medium storing computer program for traveling lane planning, and traveling lane planning method
US20220250623A1 (en) * 2021-02-08 2022-08-11 Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. Merging support device, merging support system, merging support method, and computer-readable medium
CN113002544A (en) * 2021-04-13 2021-06-22 知行汽车科技(苏州)有限公司 Ramp afflux point track planning method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2005061265A1 (en) 2005-07-07
DE10358034A1 (en) 2005-07-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20070142995A1 (en) Adaptation of an automatic distance control to traffic users potentially merging into the lane thereof
JP7003423B2 (en) Vehicle driving control device
EP3611069B1 (en) Vehicle control device
US11884277B2 (en) Method for producing a model of the surroundings of a vehicle
JP6460580B2 (en) Driving support control device
EP2042962B1 (en) Driving support system
JP6441610B2 (en) Travel control device and server
US7617037B2 (en) System for automatically monitoring a motor vehicle
EP3539838A1 (en) Vehicle control device
US20150344033A1 (en) Apparatus and computer program for assisting driver of vehicle
EP3730361A1 (en) Vehicle control device, method and computer program product
JP7205154B2 (en) Display device
US20050015203A1 (en) Lane-changing support system
EP3549838A1 (en) Vehicle control device
EP3725628B1 (en) Vehicle control device
JP3843512B2 (en) Vehicle speed control method and vehicle speed control device
JP7315680B2 (en) Methods for securing vehicles
US11180141B2 (en) Vehicle control system
JP7379033B2 (en) Driving support method and driving support device
US10994726B2 (en) Vehicle control system
JP6376522B2 (en) Vehicle control device
JP2017162248A (en) Automatic driving vehicle
JP6376520B2 (en) Vehicle control device
JPH09274700A (en) Vehicle guidance controller
JP7120742B2 (en) Driving support device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:WOLTERMANN, BERND;REEL/FRAME:018094/0675

Effective date: 20051102

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION